首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >Geopolitical jockeying: Economic nationalism and multinational strategy in historical perspective
【24h】

Geopolitical jockeying: Economic nationalism and multinational strategy in historical perspective

机译:地缘政治争夺:经济民族主义和跨国战略的历史视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research Summary We explore multinational strategy formation in the context of rising economic nationalism. Specifically, we examine how firms develop strategies to capitalize on the historical and aspirational attributes of national identity. Analyzing the histories of two German multinationals in late colonial India, we find that these firms engaged in "geopolitical jockeying" to delegitimize rival multinationals and position themselves as complementary to the economic and political goals of the host nation. Toward that end they employed "aspirational political practices," addressing the inherently future-oriented character of nationalism, and invested in the development of political capabilities to gather information and shape perceptions of national contexts. The paper contributes to a more robust conceptualization of nations and nationalism and their role in the formation of international competition and strategy.Managerial Summary Rising economic nationalism can create political and economic opportunities as well as threats for multinational firms. Through a historical analysis of the emerging strategy of two German companies-Siemens and Bayer-in late colonial India, we show how firms can engage in "geopolitical jockeying" to delegitimize rival multinationals and position themselves as complementary to the economic and political goals of host nations. To do so the companies engaged in "aspirational political practices," addressing the inherently future or goal-oriented aspects of nations, and created political capabilities designed to both gather intelligence on and shape the nationalist movements. The paper uses history as a mirror for reflecting on the causes and consequences of economic nationalism for international strategy in our own time.
机译:研究摘要我们在经济民族主义兴起的背景下探索跨国战略的形成。具体而言,我们研究了企业如何制定战略以利用国家认同的历史和理想属性。通过分析在殖民后期印度的两个德国跨国公司的历史,我们发现这些公司从事“地缘政治竞争”以使竞争对手的跨国公司合法化,并将自己定位为对东道国经济和政治目标的补充。为此,他们采用了“理想的政治实践”,以解决民族主义固有的面向未来的特征,并投资于发展政治能力以收集信息并塑造对国家背景的看法。本文有助于对国家和民族主义进行更强有力的概念化,以及它们在国际竞争和战略形成中的作用。管理摘要经济民族主义的兴起可以创造政治和经济机会,也可能给跨国公司带来威胁。通过对两家德国公司(西门子和拜耳)在印度后期殖民地的新兴战略的历史分析,我们展示了公司如何进行“地缘政治竞争”以使竞争对手的跨国公司合法化,并将自己定位为对东道国经济和政治目标的补充国家。为此,公司从事“野心勃勃的政治实践”,以解决国家固有的未来或面向目标的方面,并创建了旨在收集情报并塑造民族主义运动的政治能力。本文以历史为镜像,反思了经济民族主义对当代国际战略的成因和后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号