首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >Learning to let go: Social influence, learning, and the abandonment of corporate venture capital practices
【24h】

Learning to let go: Social influence, learning, and the abandonment of corporate venture capital practices

机译:学会放手:社会影响力,学习和放弃企业风险资本的做法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research summary: This study examines the abandonment of organizational practices. We argue that firm choices in implementing practices affect how firms experience a practice and their subsequent likelihood of abandonment. We focus on utilization of the practice and staffing (i.e. career backgrounds of managers), as two important implementation choices that firms make. The findings demonstrate that practice utilization and staffing choices not only affect abandonment likelihood directly but also condition firms' susceptibility to pressures to abandon when social referents do. Our study contributes to diffusion research by examining practice abandonmenta relatively unexplored area in diffusion researchand by incorporating specific aspects of firms' post-adoption choices into diffusion theory.Managerial summary: When do firms shut down practices? Prior research has shown that firms learn from the actions of other firms, both adopting and abandoning practices when their peers do. But unlike adoption decisions, abandonment decisions need to account for firms' own experiences with the practice. We study the abandonment of corporate venture capital (CVC) practices in the U.S. IT industry, which has experienced waves of adoption and abandonment. We find that firms that make more CVC investments are less likely to abandon the practice, and are less likely to learn vicariously from other firms' abandonment decisions, such that they are less likely to exit CVC when other firms do. Staffing choices also matter: hiring former venture capitalists makes firms less likely to abandon CVC practices, while hiring internally makes abandonment more likely. Plus, staffing choices affect how firms learn from the environment, as CVC managers pay attention to and learn more from the actions of firms that match their work backgrounds; i.e., firms that staff CVC units with former venture capitalists are more likely to follow exit decisions of VC firms, while those that staff with internal hires are more likely to follow their industry peers. Our results suggest that firms wanting to retain CVC practices should think carefully about the implementation choices they make, as they may be inadvertently sowing seeds of abandonment. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:研究摘要:本研究考察了组织实践的放弃。我们认为,企业在实施实践中的选择会影响企业体验实践的方式及其随后被抛弃的可能性。我们专注于实践和人员配置(即经理的职业背景)的利用,这是公司做出的两个重要的实施选择。研究结果表明,实践利用和人员选择不仅直接影响了被抛弃的可能性,而且还限制了企业在社会代言人这样做时对被抛弃压力的敏感性。我们的研究通过检查扩散研究中相对较未探索的领域的实践遗弃,并将公司采用后选择的特定方面纳入扩散理论中,为扩散研究做出了贡献。管理摘要:公司何时关闭实践?先前的研究表明,公司会从其他公司的行动中学到东西,在同行采取行动时会采用和放弃做法。但是,与采用决策不同,放弃决策需要考虑企业自身在实践中的经验。我们研究了在经历了采用和放弃浪潮的美国IT行业中放弃企业风险资本(CVC)的做法。我们发现,进行更多CVC投资的公司不太可能放弃这种做法,也不太可能从其他公司的放弃决策中吸取教训,因此当其他公司这样做时,他们退出CVC的可能性也较小。人员配置的选择也很重要:雇用前风险资本家会使公司放弃CVC做法的可能性较小,而内部雇用则使公司放弃CVC行为的可能性更大。另外,人员配备的选择会影响企业从环境中学习的方式,因为CVC经理会关注与他们的工作背景相匹配的企业的行为并从中学习更多。即,将CVC部门与前风险资本家联系在一起的公司更可能遵循VC公司的退出决定,而那些内部雇用人员的公司则更有可能遵循行业同行。我们的结果表明,希望保留CVC做法的公司应仔细考虑他们做出的实施选择,因为它们可能会无意间撒下了放弃的种子。版权所有(c)2015 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号