首页> 外文期刊>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment >Multiple hydrological models comparison and an improved Bayesian model averaging approach for ensemble prediction over semi-humid regions
【24h】

Multiple hydrological models comparison and an improved Bayesian model averaging approach for ensemble prediction over semi-humid regions

机译:多个水文模型比较和改进的贝叶斯模型平均方法在半湿润地区的总体预报

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In semi-humid regions, accurate prediction of flood processes is challenging. The goal of this study is to gain more insights into the runoff generation mechanism in semi-humid regions using multiple-model comparison method and explore the Bayesian model averaging (BMA) approach to improve flood prediction. This study compares seven runoff generation models for three semi-humid catchments in northern China. Flood events were classified into three categories, low-flow, medium-flow, and high-flow, according to flood peak flow in order to quantify the performance of each model and identify the dominant runoff generation mechanism for semi-humid catchments. Based on the performances of seven runoff generation models, three BMA schemes were used to integrate these models to compare the advantages of different combination methods. For the purpose of improving the performance of BMA over semi-humid regions, a physically based BMA approach, Green-Ampt-BMA approach (G-BMA), was proposed. In the G-BMA approach, an infiltration-excess flow module was added with the surface runoff calculated using the Green-Ampt equation. Considering the heterogeneity of precipitation and underlying surface characteristics, a distribution curve of infiltration capacity was introduced to simulate runoff processes. The results show that models with saturation-excess mechanism perform well for semi-humid catchments. The saturation-excess and infiltration-excess runoff exist simultaneously in a flood process over different catchments with different ratios of infiltration-excess to saturation-excess runoff. We found that the BMA approach effectively takes advantage of each model to provide more accurate forecasts. The physically based G-BMA approach performs better than the BMA approach for semi-humid regions with high ratio of infiltration-excess surface flow, especially in reducing flood peak error and forecast uncertainty.
机译:在半湿润地区,准确预测洪水过程具有挑战性。这项研究的目的是使用多模型比较方法获得更多关于半湿润地区径流产生机理的见解,并探索贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)方法来改善洪水预报。这项研究比较了中国北方三个半湿润地区的七个径流产生模型。根据洪峰流量,洪水事件分为三类:低流量,中流量和高流量,以便量化每个模型的性能并确定半湿润集水区的主要径流产生机制。基于七个径流生成模型的性能,使用三种BMA方案对这些模型进行集成,以比较不同组合方法的优势。为了改善半湿润地区的BMA性能,提出了一种基于物理的BMA方法,即Green-Ampt-BMA方法(G-BMA)。在G-BMA方法中,增加了一个渗入过量流模块,并使用Green-Ampt方程计算了地表径流。考虑到降水的不均匀性和下垫面的特征,引入了入渗能力的分布曲线来模拟径流过程。结果表明,具有饱和度过量机制的模型对于半湿润集水区表现良好。在不同集水区,不同的入渗-溢流与饱和-溢流比率不同的洪水过程中,饱和-溢流径流同时存在。我们发现BMA方法有效地利用了每种模型来提供更准确的预测。基于物理的G-BMA方法在渗透率过多的地表水比例较高的半湿润地区的性能要优于BMA方法,特别是在减少洪峰误差和预报不确定性方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号