...
首页> 外文期刊>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment >Do emissions and income have a common trend? A country-specific, time-series, global analysis, 1970-2008
【24h】

Do emissions and income have a common trend? A country-specific, time-series, global analysis, 1970-2008

机译:排放和收入有共同趋势吗? 1970-2008年针对特定国家/地区的时间序列全球分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper analyzes the relation between income and emissions in the period 1970-2008, for all world countries. We consider time-series of CO_2, SO_2 and GWP100, and use Vector Autoregressive models that allow for nonstationarity and cointegration. At 5 % significance level, income and emissions are found to be driven by unrelated random walks with drift (respectively by a common random walk with drift) in about 70 % (respectively 25 %) of cases; in the remaining cases the variables are trend-stationary. Tests of Granger-causality show evidence of both directions of causality. For the case of unrelated stochastic trends, we almost never find income driving emissions, as predicted by a consumption-function interpretation. These causality results and the absence of a common trend challenge the main implications of the Environmental Kuznets Curve, namely that the dominant direction of causality should be from income to emissions, and that for increasing levels of income, emissions should tend to decrease.
机译:本文分析了所有世界国家在1970-2008年间的收入与排放之间的关系。我们考虑了CO_2,SO_2和GWP100的时间序列,并使用允许不平稳和协整的向量自回归模型。在显着性水平为5%的情况下,大约70%(分别为25%)的情况下,收入和排放受不相关的随机漂移随动(分别由具有漂移的普通随机游动)驱动;在其余情况下,变量是趋势平稳的。格兰杰因果关系的检验表明了因果关系的两个方向。对于不相关的随机趋势,正如消费函数解释所预测的,我们几乎从来没有发现收入驱动的排放。这些因果关系的结果以及缺乏共同趋势,挑战了环境库兹涅茨曲线的主要含义,即因果关系的主导方向应该是从收入到排放,而对于增加收入水平,排放应趋于减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号