首页> 外文期刊>South Asian Journal of Global Business Research >General decision making style: evidence from India
【24h】

General decision making style: evidence from India

机译:总体决策风格:来自印度的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine applicability of the general decision-making style (GDMS) inventory in India, using a sample of managers. In addition the authors identify various decision-making styles (DMS) of Indian managers and explore their association with respondents' gender, age, education, experience level, annual income, sector, industry and organizational output. Design/methodology/approach - The sample consisted responses of 500 Indian managers from public (13 percent) and private (87 percent) sector organizations. The data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, regression analysis, independent sample Wests and ANOVA. Findings - All decision-making sub scales (rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant and spontaneous) had satisfactory reliabilities and internal consistencies. Results obtained factor structure that confirmed the original five-factor structure of GDMS. There were also mutual correlations among the styles. Moreover, there were significant differences in the DMS across respondents' profile variables. Research limitations/implications - This research is based upon survey method and voluntary participation. Hence one can question generalization of findings to larger samples. Practical implications - Results provide insights into DMS of the Indian managers. Organizations may use GDMS as a selection tool, respondents may hone their DMS. Originality/value - A majority of researchers use survey without evaluating validity of the instruments in the selected context and sample. This research contributed to the literature and practice by testing validation of the GDMS inventory in India.
机译:目的-本文的目的是使用管理人员样本研究印度一般决策风格(GDMS)清单的适用性。此外,作者确定了印度经理人的各种决策风格(DMS),并探讨了他们与受访者的性别,年龄,教育程度,经验水平,年收入,行业,行业和组织产出的关系。设计/方法/方法-样本包括来自公共部门(占13%)和私营部门(占87%)的500名印度经理的回答。使用探索性因子分析,验证性因子分析,相关性分析,回归分析,独立样本Wests和ANOVA分析数据。调查结果-所有决策子量表(理性,直观,依赖,避免和自发)均具有令人满意的可靠性和内部一致性。结果获得的因子结构证实了GDMS的原始五因子结构。样式之间也存在相互关系。此外,不同受访者个人资料变量之间的DMS存在显着差异。研究的局限性/意义-该研究基于调查方法和自愿参与。因此,人们可能会质疑将结果概括为更大的样本。实际意义-结果为印度经理人的DMS提供了见识。组织可以使用GDMS作为选择工具,受访者可以磨练其DMS。原创性/价值-大多数研究人员在不评估所选背景和样本中工具有效性的情况下使用调查。这项研究通过测试印度GDMS库存的验证,为文献和实践做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号