...
首页> 外文期刊>Solar Physics >Comparison of Cone Model Parameters for Halo Coronal Mass Ejections
【24h】

Comparison of Cone Model Parameters for Halo Coronal Mass Ejections

机译:晕冠状物质抛射的锥体模型参数比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Halo coronal mass ejections (HCMEs) are a major cause of geomagnetic storms, hence their three-dimensional structures are important for space weather. We compare three cone models: an elliptical-cone model, an ice-cream-cone model, and an asymmetric-cone model. These models allow us to determine three-dimensional parameters of HCMEs such as radial speed, angular width, and the angle [γ] between sky plane and cone axis. We compare these parameters obtained from three models using 62 HCMEs observed by SOHO/LASCO from 2001 to 2002. Then we obtain the root-mean-square (RMS) error between the highest measured projection speeds and their calculated projection speeds from the cone models. As a result, we find that the radial speeds obtained from the models are well correlated with one another (R > 0.8). The correlation coefficients between angular widths range from 0.1 to 0.48 and those between γ-values range from −0.08 to 0.47, which is much smaller than expected. The reason may be the different assumptions and methods. The RMS errors between the highest measured projection speeds and the highest estimated projection speeds of the elliptical-cone model, the ice-cream-cone model, and the asymmetric-cone model are 376 km s−1, 169 km s−1, and 152 km s−1. We obtain the correlation coefficients between the location from the models and the flare location (R > 0.45). Finally, we discuss strengths and weaknesses of these models in terms of space-weather application.
机译:晕冠冕物质抛射(HCME)是地磁风暴的主要原因,因此它们的三维结构对于太空天气很重要。我们比较了三种圆锥模型:椭圆圆锥模型,冰淇淋圆锥模型和非对称圆锥模型。这些模型使我们能够确定HCME的三维参数,例如径向速度,角宽度以及天空平面和圆锥轴之间的角度[γ]。我们比较了使用SOHO / LASCO在2001年至2002年观察到的62种HCME从三个模型获得的这些参数。然后,我们从圆锥模型获得了最高测量投影速度与其计算的投影速度之间的均方根(RMS)误差。结果,我们发现从模型获得的径向速度彼此之间具有很好的相关性(R> 0.8)。角宽度之间的相关系数在0.1到0.48之间,而γ值之间的相关系数在-0.08到0.47之间,远小于预期。原因可能是不同的假设和方法。椭圆圆锥模型,冰淇淋圆锥模型和非对称圆锥模型的最高实测投影速度与最高估计投影速度之间的RMS误差为376 km s-1、169 km s-1和152 kms-1。我们从模型的位置和耀斑位置之间获得相关系数(R> 0.45)。最后,我们从空间天气应用的角度讨论了这些模型的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号