首页> 外文期刊>Solar Physics >Comparison of Ground-Based and Space-Based Longitudinal Magnetograms
【24h】

Comparison of Ground-Based and Space-Based Longitudinal Magnetograms

机译:地基和空基纵向磁图的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We compare photospheric line-of-sight magnetograms from the Synoptic Optical Long-term Investigations of the Sun (SOLIS) Vector Spectro-Magnetograph (VSM) instrument with observations from the 150-foot Solar Tower at Mt. Wilson Observatory (MWO), the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), and the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) on the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO). We find very good agreement between VSM and the other data sources for both disk-averaged flux densities and pixel-by-pixel measurements. We show that the VSM mean flux density time series is of consistently high signal-to-noise ratio with no significant zero offsets. We discuss in detail some of the factors – spatial resolution, flux dependence, and position on the solar disk – affecting the determination of scaling between VSM and SOHO/MDI or SDO/HMI magnetograms. The VSM flux densities agree well with spatially smoothed data from MDI and HMI, although the scaling factors show a clear dependence on flux density. The factor to convert VSM to HMI increases with increasing flux density (from ≈1 to ≈1.5). The nonlinearity is smaller for the VSM vs. SOHO/MDI scaling factor (from ≈1 to ≈1.2).
机译:我们将来自太阳(SOLIS)矢量光谱电磁仪(VSM)的天气概要光学长期研究的光层视线磁图与来自Mt的150英尺太阳塔的观测结果进行比较。威尔逊天文台(MWO),太阳动力学天文台(SDO)上的日震和磁成像仪(HMI),以及太阳和日球天文台(SOHO)上的迈克尔逊多普勒成像仪(MDI)。对于磁盘平均磁通密度和逐像素测量,我们发现VSM与其他数据源之间有很好的一致性。我们表明,VSM平均通量密度时间序列具有一致的高信噪比,没有明显的零偏移。我们将详细讨论一些因素-空间分辨率,通量依赖性以及在太阳盘上的位置-影响VSM与SOHO / MDI或SDO / HMI磁图之间缩放比例的确定。 VSM通量密度与MDI和HMI的空间平滑数据非常吻合,尽管比例因子显示出对通量密度的明显依赖性。 VSM转换为HMI的因数随通量密度的增加(从≈1到≈1.5)而增加。 VSM与SOHO / MDI缩放因子的非线性较小(从≈1到≈1.2)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号