首页> 外文期刊>Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering >Evaluation of approximate methods for estimating maximum displacement response of MDOF systems
【24h】

Evaluation of approximate methods for estimating maximum displacement response of MDOF systems

机译:评估估计MDOF系统最大位移响应的近似方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study evaluates the accuracy of seven approximate methods to estimate nonlinear maximum roof displacement and the maximum inter-story drift ratio of multi-degree-of-freedom systems. The approximate methods were classified in three groups. The first group includes methods based on equivalent single-degree-of freedom systems; the second group contains methods based on displacement amplification factors, while the third group includes methods based on equivalent linearization. The accuracy of the approximate methods is evaluated from displacement demands computed by rigorous nonlinear time history (NLTH) analysis of a family of RC frames subjected to sets of far-field and near-field earthquake ground motions. Results obtained from this investigation showed that the average relative error between the estimated maximum roof displacement and that obtained from NLTH analysis was greater than about 31% for the first and second group of methods, while average relative error was less than 25.5% for the third group, for the range of periods of vibration considered in this study. The average relative error of all methods for estimating maximum inter-story drift ratio was in the range of 32-35% for far-field earthquake ground motion records. For near-field earthquake ground motion records, the average relative error of the first and second group was more than about 35%, while it was less than about 30% for the third group. According to the results, the third group of methods provides reasonable estimates of maximum roof displacement and interstory drift demands, which is particularly true for the near-field earthquake ground motion records.
机译:这项研究评估了估计多种自由度系统的非线性最大屋顶位移和最大层间漂移率的七种近似方法的准确性。近似方法分为三组。第一组包括基于等效单自由度系统的方法。第二组包含基于位移放大因子的方法,而第三组包含基于等效线性化的方法。近似方法的准确性是根据位移需求进行评估的,位移需求是通过对一系列受远场和近场地震地震动作用的RC框架进行严格的非线性时程(NLTH)分析而得出的。从这项调查中获得的结果表明,第一组和第二组方法的估计最大屋顶位移与NLTH分析获得的平均相对误差大于约31%,而第三组方法的平均相对误差小于25.5%。在本研究中考虑的振动周期范围。对于远场地震地面运动记录,所有估计最大层间漂移率的方法的平均相对误差在32-35%的范围内。对于近场地震地震动记录,第一和第二组的平均相对误差大于35%,而第三组的平均相对误差小于30%。根据结果​​,第三组方法提供了最大屋顶位移和层间漂移需求的合理估计,这对于近场地震地面运动记录尤其如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号