首页> 外文期刊>Socio-Economic Review >Karl Polanyi and the antinomies of embeddedness
【24h】

Karl Polanyi and the antinomies of embeddedness

机译:卡尔·波拉尼(Karl Polanyi)与嵌入性的对立面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While Polanyi argues that all economies are embedded and enmeshed in social relations and institutions, he tends to see market economy as disembedded, which reveals a tension in his thought. The main motivation for this paper is to understand the origins of this tension. On the basis of a systematic formulation of Polanyi's work, it is argued that Polanyi employs embeddedness in a dual manner: (a) as a methodological principle akin to methodological holism, and (b) as a theoretical proposition on the changing place of economy in society. These two formulations of embeddedness contradict each other. After tracing out the origins of this contradiction, this paper concludes by considering the implications of this analysis for economic sociology. It is argued that embeddedness as a methodological principle is the only acceptable usage of the term. Yet, in this capacity, embeddedness falls short of economic sociology's goal of providing a theoretical alternative to neoclassical economics.
机译:波兰尼(Polanyi)辩称,所有经济体都嵌入并融入了社会关系和制度中,但他倾向于将市场经济视为被剥夺的,这表明了他思想的紧张。本文的主要动机是了解这种紧张关系的根源。在对波兰尼的工作进行系统的表述的基础上,有人认为波兰尼以双重方式运用嵌入性:(a)作为类似于方法论整体论的方法论原理,(b)作为关于经济中日新月异的理论命题社会。嵌入的这两种表达方式相互矛盾。在找出这种矛盾的根源之后,本文最后考虑了这种分析对经济社会学的意义。有人认为,嵌入性是方法学上的原则,是该术语唯一可以接受的用法。然而,以这种能力,嵌入性未能达到经济社会学为新古典经济学提供理论选择的目标。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Socio-Economic Review》 |2008年第1期|p.5-33|共29页
  • 作者

    Kurtuluş Gemici;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Sociology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1551, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号