首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Constructing contentious and noncontentious facts: How gynecology textbooks create certainty around pharma-contraceptive safety
【24h】

Constructing contentious and noncontentious facts: How gynecology textbooks create certainty around pharma-contraceptive safety

机译:建构有争议和无争议的事实:妇科教科书如何围绕药物避孕安全性确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using critical discourse analysis, we examine how seven popular gynecology textbooks use sociolinguistic devices to describe the health effects of pharma-contraception (intrauterine and hormonal methods). Though previous studies have noted that textbooks generally use neutral language, we find that gynecology textbooks differentially deployed linguistic devices, framing pharma-contraceptive benefits as certain and risks as doubtful. These discursive strategies transform pharma-contraceptive safety into fact. We expand on Latour and Woolgar's concept of noncontentious facts by showing how some facts that are taken for granted by the medical community still require discursive fortification to counter potential negative accusations from outside the profession. We call these contentious facts. Our findings suggest that a pro-pharma orientation exists in gynecology textbooks, which may influence physicians' understanding of pharmaceutical safety. As such, these texts may affect medical practice by normalizing pharma-contraceptives without full considerations of their risks.
机译:使用批判性话语分析,我们研究了七种流行的妇科教科书如何使用社会语言学的设备来描述药物避孕(子宫内和激素方法)对健康的影响。尽管先前的研究已经注意到教科书通常使用中性语言,但我们发现妇科教科书以不同的方式部署语言设备,将药物避孕益处确定为肯定,并将风险置为可疑。这些话语策略将药物避孕的安全性转化为事实。我们通过展示拉图尔和伍尔加的无争议事实的概念,来扩展医学界认为是理所当然的一些事实,仍然需要话语防御来抵御来自该行业之外的潜在负面指控。我们称这些有争​​议的事实。我们的发现表明,妇科教科书中存在药物前倾向,这可能会影响医生对药物安全性的理解。因此,这些文本可能会通过规范药物避孕药而未充分考虑其风险来影响医学实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号