首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Active Compounds and Atoms of Society: Plants, Bodies, Minds and Cultures in the Work of Kenyan Ethnobotanical Knowledge
【24h】

Active Compounds and Atoms of Society: Plants, Bodies, Minds and Cultures in the Work of Kenyan Ethnobotanical Knowledge

机译:活性成分和社会原子:肯尼亚民族植物学知识的工作中的植物,身体,思想和文化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines a sequence of investigations in parasitology, botany, pharmacology, psychometrics and ethnopsychology focused on Kenyan village children's knowledge of medicinal herbs. We follow this work of making and ordering of knowledge, showing that the different disciplinary perspectives on bodies, medicines, knowledges, children and cultures produced by this research all sought the foundation of knowledge in reference to objective reality, and that they aimed to make the world known in the specific form of distinct and comparable entities with individual properties and capacities. Based on subsequent ethnographic observations of healing in the same village, we outline a different, contrasting modality of knowing, which places ontology above epistemology. Medicinal knowledge and its transformational capacity are here not located within entities but between them; not in objective reality but in effects; 'to know' means 'to come together' with the implication of having an effect on one another. We use this ethnographic sketch of a different form of knowing as a foil against which to contrast the imaginary that had shaped our previous research. Beyond the stark contrast between herbal village healing and pharmacological laboratory analysis, we expand our argument by moving from natural science to social science, from studies of plants and substances to those of humans, minds and cultures; from laboratories to ethno-psychological tests, cultural models, and eventually econometrics. We suggest that by reiterating a particular scientific imaginary, remaking humans (and non-human beings) as known things, a specific notion of man and a related political economy of knowledge is naturalized. Looking back at our involvement with this sequence of research, we realize that, contrary to our intentions, our inclusion as 'social scientists' into a multidisciplinary scientific project may have exacerbated rather than mitigated its potentially problematic effects.
机译:本文研究了一系列针对寄生虫学,植物学,药理学,心理计量学和民族心理学的研究,重点是肯尼亚乡村儿童对草药的了解。我们遵循知识的形成和排序的工作,表明本研究产生的关于身体,药物,知识,儿童和文化的不同学科观点都寻求参照客观现实的知识基础,并且他们旨在使知识成为现实。以具有不同属性和能力的独特且可比较的实体的特定形式而闻名的世界。基于随后的人种学研究在同一村庄中的康复情况,我们概述了一种不同的,相反的知情方式,这将本体置于认识论之上。这里的医学知识及其转化能力不在实体内部,而是在实体之间。不是在客观现实中,而是在效果上; “知道”意味着“走到一起”,意味着彼此产生影响。我们使用这种不同形式的知识的人种志草图作为陪衬,与形成我们先前研究的假想进行对比。除了草药村疗愈和药理实验室分析之间的鲜明对比之外,我们还从自然科学转向社会科学,从植物和物质研究到人类,思想和文化研究,扩展了我们的论点。从实验室到种族心理测试,文化模型,甚至是计量经济学。我们建议,通过重申特定的科学假想,将人类(和非人类)改造为已知事物,就可以具体化人的观念和相关的知识政治经济学。回顾我们对这一系列研究的参与,我们意识到,与我们的意图相反,将我们作为“社会科学家”纳入多学科科学项目可能会加剧而不是减轻其潜在的问题性影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号