首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Indigenous body parts, mutating temporalities, and the half-lives of postcolonial technoscience
【24h】

Indigenous body parts, mutating temporalities, and the half-lives of postcolonial technoscience

机译:土著身体部位,变异的时间和后殖民技术的半衰期

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Biological samples collected from indigenous communities from the mid-20th century for scientific study and preserved in freezers of the Global North have been at the center of a number of controversies. This essay explores why the problem of indigenous biospecimens has returned to critical attention frequently over the past two decades, and why and how Science and Technology Studies should attend to this problem. We propose that mutation - the variously advantageous, deleterious, or neutral mechanism of biological change - can provide a conceptual and analogical resource for reckoning with unexpected problems created by the persistence of frozen indigenous biospecimens. Mutations transcend dichotomies of premodern/modern, pro-science/anti-science, and north/south, inviting us to focus on entanglements and interdependencies. Freezing biospecimens induces mutations in indigenous populations, in the scientists who collected and stored such specimens, and in the specimens themselves. The jumbling of timescales introduced by practices of freezing generates new ethical problems: problems that become ever more acute as the supposed immortality of frozen samples meets the mortality of the scientists who maintain them. More broadly, we propose that an 'abductive' approach to Science and Technology Studies theories of co-production can direct attention to the work of temporality in the ongoing alignment of social and technical orders. Attending to the unfolding and mutating vital legacies of indigenous body parts, collected in one time and place and reused in others, reveals the enduring colonial dimensions of scientific practice in our global age and demonstrates new openings for ethical action. Finally, we outline the articles in this special issue and their respective 'mutations' to postcolonial Science and Technology Studies, a field that, like genome science, is racked with ethical and temporal dilemmas of reckoning for the past in the present.
机译:自20世纪中叶以来,从土著社区收集的生物样本用于科学研究,并保存在全球北部的冰柜中,一直是许多争议的中心。本文探讨了为何在过去的二十年中,本地生物标本的问题经常引起人们的广泛关注,以及科学技术研究为何以及如何应对这一问题。我们提出,突变-生物变化的各种有利,有害或中性的机制-可以提供一种概念和类比资源,以解决因冷冻土著生物标本的持续存在而引起的意外问题。变异超越了前现代/现代,亲科学/反科学和北/南两分法,邀请我们专注于纠缠和相互依存。冷冻生物标本会在土著人口,收集和储存此类标本的科学家以及标本本身中引起突变。冷冻实践引入的时间尺度混乱产生了新的伦理学问题:随着所谓的冷冻样品的永生性满足维护它们的科学家的死亡,这些问题变得更加严重。更广泛地说,我们建议对联合生产的科学技术理论的“归纳”方法可以在社会和技术秩序的持续调整中将注意力转移到暂时性的工作上。一次就地采集并在其他地方重复使用的土著人体器官重要遗产的不断发展和变异,揭示了我们全球时代科学实践的持久殖民地规模,并显示了道德行动的新机遇。最后,我们概述了本期特刊中的文章,以及它们各自对后殖民科学技术研究的“变异”,后者与基因组科学一样,在伦理和时间上都面临着对过去的反思。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号