首页> 外文期刊>Social Sciences in China >The Positive and the Negative Method and the Spheres of Living: Some Thoughts on Feng Youlan’s Philosophical Method
【24h】

The Positive and the Negative Method and the Spheres of Living: Some Thoughts on Feng Youlan’s Philosophical Method

机译:正负方法与生活领域:对冯友兰哲学方法的一些思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

, , “”, , “ ”, , , , , : Among contemporary Chinese philosophers, Feng Youlan had the greatest degree of methodological self-awareness. In his earlier years, he especially emphasized the formalist meaning (not touching on content) of metaphysical concepts and propositions and defined the negative method too narrowly, leading to some theoretical confusion over the inherent unity of the two methods. In his later years, he employed the concept of the “concrete universal” to reflect on his philosophical system; while affirming the formalism of philosophical conceptual category, he revealed the “peculiar content” of the category as a means of grasping actuality and its intellectual movements, thus realizing the mutual accommodation of rationality and intuition (mystery). A review of Feng’s philosophical system in accordance with the theoretical reflections of his later years will indicate the consistency of his thought throughout his life. His new understanding of his own philosophical system and the nature of philosophy on the basis of the “concrete universal” was the logical outcome of his previous ideas. Only with this in mind will we be able to attain a better understanding of the methodology and true spirit of Feng’s philosophy and draw inspiration for the contemporary reconstruction of Chinese philosophy and culture.View full textDownload full textKeywordsFeng Youlan, positive method, negative method, life realmRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2011.625176
机译:,,,:,,,,:在当代中国哲学家中,冯友兰具有最大的方法论自我意识。在他的早些年间,他特别强调形而上学概念和命题的形式主义含义(不涉及内容),并且对否定方法的定义过于狭窄,导致对这两种方法的固有统一性造成了一些理论上的困惑。在他的晚年,他运用“具体普遍性”的概念来反思他的哲学体系。他在肯定哲学概念范畴的形式主义的同时,揭示了范畴的“特殊内容”,作为把握现实及其思想运动的一种手段,从而实现了理性与直觉(神秘)的相互适应。根据冯晚年的理论反思对他的哲学体系进行回顾,将表明他一生的思想是一致的。在“具体普遍性”的基础上,他对自己的哲学体系和哲学本质有了新的理解,这是他先前思想的逻辑结果。只有牢记这一点,我们才能更好地了解冯氏哲学的方法论和真实精神,并为当代中国哲学和文化的重建汲取灵感。查看全文下载全文关键词冯友兰,积极的方法,否定的方法,生活领域相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b” };添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2011.625176

著录项

  • 来源
    《Social Sciences in China》 |2011年第4期|p.59-77|共19页
  • 作者

    Li Jinglina;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:53:19

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号