...
首页> 外文期刊>Social influence >Spoofing: social commentary or effective marketing tool? Testing promotion vs. prevention message frames in college students' fight against obesity
【24h】

Spoofing: social commentary or effective marketing tool? Testing promotion vs. prevention message frames in college students' fight against obesity

机译:欺骗:社交评论还是有效的营销工具?在大学生对抗肥胖中测试促进与预防信息框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Spoofs parody regular advertisements in an attempt to discourage consumers from using or buying certain products. Using regulatory focus theory, the overarching question in this paper was whether spoofs (promotion vs. prevention) act as anti-consumption messages to fight obesity among college students. In Study 1, a repeated measures design was employed where participants were shown the regular ad followed by either spoof, while in Study 2, a between-subjects design was used and participants were exposed to either one of the three ads. Findings from both studies confirmed that spoofing potentially impacts brands, specifically, purchase intentions. Effectiveness of either spoof varies with respect to the presentation order of the ads and levels of anti-commercial consumer rebellion. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
机译:欺骗仿冒常规广告,以阻止消费者使用或购买某些产品。使用监管焦点理论,本文的首要问题是欺骗(促销与预防)是否可作为反消费信息,以对抗大学生的肥胖症。在研究1中,采用了重复测量设计,向参与者显示了常规广告,然后是其中一个欺骗;而在研究2中,则采用了主题间设计,并使参与者接触到这三个广告之一。两项研究的结果都证实,欺骗可能会影响品牌,尤其是购买意图。两种欺骗的效果都随广告的显示顺序和反商业消费者叛乱程度的不同而不同。理论和管理意义进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号