首页> 外文期刊>Social Indicators Research >How Social Relations and Structures can Produce Happiness and Unhappiness: An International Comparative Analysis
【24h】

How Social Relations and Structures can Produce Happiness and Unhappiness: An International Comparative Analysis

机译:社会关系和结构如何产生幸福和不幸福:国际比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, subjective well being, as measured by survey questions on happiness and life satisfaction, is investigated from a sociological-comparative point of view. The central thesis is that happiness and satisfaction must be understood as the outcome of an interaction process between individual characteristics and aspirations on the one side, and social relations and macrosocial structures on the other side. A distinction is made between life satisfaction and happiness; the former is more seen as the outcome of an evaluation process including material and social aspirations and achievements, the latter as an outcome of positive experiences, particularly close personal relationships. The focus of this paper is on micro- and macrosocial conditions favouring or inhibiting the emergence of happiness and satisfaction. It is hypothesized that dense and good basic social relations, occupational involvement and success, sociocultural (religious and altruistic) orientations and participation are conducive to happiness and life satisfaction; the same should be true at the macrolevel for economic prosperity, relatively equal social structures, a well-established welfare state and political democracy. The latter conditions, however, should be more important for life satisfaction than for happiness. A comparative, multilevel regression analysis of happiness in 41 nations around the world is carried out (using the World Value Survey 1995–1997). Both our general assumption and most of the specific hypotheses could be confirmed. It turned very clearly that “happiness” and “life satisfaction” are two different concepts. It could be shown that microsocial embedding and sociocultural integration of a person are highly relevant for happiness. However, contrary to earlier studies, we find that macrosocial factors like the economic wealth of nation, the distribution of income, the extent of the welfare state and political freedom are also relevant, particularly for satisfaction. What counts most is the ability to cope with life, including subjective health and financial satisfaction, close social relations, and the economic perspectives for improvement in the future, both at the level of the individual and at that of the society. These abilities are certainly improved by favourable macrosocial conditions and institutions, such as a more equal income distribution, political democracy and a welfare state.
机译:本文从社会学比较的角度研究了主观幸福感,该幸福感是通过关于幸福感和生活满意度的调查问题来衡量的。中心论点是,幸福和满意必须被理解为一方面是个体特征和愿望之间的相互作用过程的结果,另一方面是社会关系和宏观社会结构之间相互作用的过程的结果。生活满意度和幸福之间是有区别的。前者更多地被视为包括物质和社会期望与成就的评估过程的结果,后者则是积极经历,特别是亲密的人际关系的结果。本文的重点是在有利于或抑制幸福和满足感出现的微观和宏观社会条件下。据推测,紧密而良好的基本社会关系,职业参与和成功,社会文化(宗教和利他主义)取向和参与有利于幸福和生活满意度;在经济繁荣,相对平等的社会结构,完善的福利国家和政治民主方面,宏观层面也应如此。但是,后一种情况对于生活满意度而言,比对幸福感更为重要。对世界上41个国家的幸福进行了比较,多层次的回归分析(使用1995-1997年世界价值调查)。我们的一般假设和大多数特定假设都可以得到证实。事实证明,“幸福”和“生活满意度”是两个不同的概念。可以证明,一个人的微观社会嵌入和社会文化融合与幸福息息相关。但是,与早期的研究相反,我们发现诸如国家的经济财富,收入分配,福利国家的程度和政治自由等宏观社会因素也具有相关性,特别是对于满意度而言。最重要的是在个人和社会层面上应对生活的能力,包括主观健康和财务满意度,紧密的社会关系以及未来改善的经济前景。有利的宏观社会条件和体制,例如更平等的收入分配,政治民主和福利国家,肯定会提高这些能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号