首页> 外文OA文献 >How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: an international comparative analysis
【2h】

How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: an international comparative analysis

机译:社会关系和结构如何产生幸福和不幸福:国际比较分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

"In this paper, subjective well being, as measured by survey questions on happiness and life satisfaction, is investigated from a sociological-comparative point of view. The central thesis is that happiness and satisfaction must be understood as the outcome of an interaction process between individual characteristics and aspirations on the one side, and social relations and macrosocial structures on the other side. A distinction is made between life satisfaction and happiness; the former is more seen as the outcome of an evaluation process including material and social aspirations and achievements, the latter as an outcome of positive experiences, particularly close personal relationships. The focus of this paper is on micro- and macrosocial conditions favouring or inhibiting the emergence of happiness and satisfaction. It is hypothesized that dense and good basic social relations, occupational involvement and success, sociocultural (religious and altruistic) orientations and participation are conducive to happiness and life satisfaction; the same should be true at the macrolevel for economic prosperity, relatively equal social structures, a well-established welfare state and political democracy. The latter conditions, however, should be more important for life satisfaction than for happiness. A comparative, multilevel regression analysis of happiness in 41 nations around the world is carried out (using the World Value Survey 1995–1997). Both our general assumption and most of the specific hypotheses could be confirmed. It turned very clearly that “happiness” and “life satisfaction” are two different concepts. It could be shown that microsocial embedding and sociocultural integration of a person are highly relevant for happiness. However, contrary to earlier studies, we find that macrosocial factors like the economic wealth of nation, the distribution of income, the extent of the welfare state and political freedom are also relevant, particularly for satisfaction. What counts most is the ability to cope with life, including subjective health and financial satisfaction, close social relations, and the economic perspectives for improvement in the future, both at the level of the individual and at that of the society. These abilities are certainly improved by favourable macrosocial conditions and institutions, such as a more equal income distribution, political democracy and a welfare state." (author's abstract)
机译:“本文从社会学比较的角度对主观幸福感进行了调查,该主观幸福感是通过对幸福感和生活满意度的调查问题来衡量的。中心论点是,幸福感和满足感必须理解为彼此之间互动过程的结果。一方面是个人特征和愿望,另一方面是社会关系和宏观社会结构。生活满意度和幸福之间是有区别的;前者更多地被视为包括物质和社会愿望和成就的评估过程的结果,后者是积极经历的结果,特别是亲密的人际关系。本文的重点是在有利于或抑制幸福和满足感出现的微观和宏观社会条件下,假设紧密而良好的基本社会关系,职业参与和成功,社会文化(宗教和利他主义)取向和参与有利于幸福和生活满意度;在经济繁荣,相对平等的社会结构,完善的福利国家和政治民主方面,宏观层面也应如此。但是,后一种情况对于生活满意度而言,比对幸福感更为重要。对世界上41个国家的幸福进行了比较,多层次的回归分析(使用1995-1997年世界价值调查)。我们的一般假设和大多数特定假设都可以得到证实。事实证明,“幸福”和“生活满意度”是两个不同的概念。可以证明,一个人的微观社会嵌入和社会文化融合与幸福息息相关。但是,与先前的研究相反,我们发现宏观社会因素,例如国家的经济财富,收入分配,福利国家的程度和政治自由,也都具有相关性,特别是对于满意度。最重要的是在个人和社会层面上应付生活的能力,包括主观健康和财务满意度,密切的社会关系以及未来改善的经济前景。有利的宏观社会条件和制度,例如收入分配更加均等,政治民主和福利国家,肯定会提高这些能力。”(作者摘要)

著录项

  • 作者

    Haller Max; Hadler Markus;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号