首页> 外文期刊>Social Indicators Research >Does Weighting Capture What’s Important? Revisiting Subjective Importance Weighting with a Quality of Life Measure
【24h】

Does Weighting Capture What’s Important? Revisiting Subjective Importance Weighting with a Quality of Life Measure

机译:权重捕获重要内容吗?运用生活质量量度重新审视主观重要性加权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The present study evaluated subjective importance weighting using data collected with the Injection Drug User Quality of Life Scale (IDUQOL). Weighted and unweighted IDUQOL scores from 241 adults were correlated with convergent, discriminant, and criterion measures. Regression analysis was used to examine the contribution of importance ratings to scores on a global measure of life satisfaction and the corrected weighted IDUQOL total scores. Overall, the results showed that weighted scores did not perform better than unweighted scores in measuring quality of life. However, the mean satisfaction ratings for important domains correlated significantly higher with convergent measures than did the mean satisfaction ratings for unimportant domains. This finding suggests further attention needs to be paid to the meaning and measurement of subjective importance and how it may be incorporated more effectively into measures of quality of life.
机译:本研究使用注射药物使用者生活质量量表(IDUQOL)收集的数据评估了主观重要性加权。来自241名成年人的加权和未加权IDUQOL得分与收敛,判别和标准量度相关。回归分析被用来检查重要性等级对生活满意度的整体衡量指标和校正后的加权IDUQOL总得分的贡献。总体而言,结果表明,在衡量生活质量时,加权分数的表现并不比未加权分数好。但是,重要领域的平均满意度等级与收敛性度量的相关性要比不重要领域的平均满意度更高。这一发现表明,需要进一步关注主观重要性的含义和度量,以及如何将其更有效地纳入生活质量的衡量标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号