首页> 外文期刊>Social Indicators Research >Happy by What Standard? The Role of Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Comparisons in Ratings of Happiness
【24h】

Happy by What Standard? The Role of Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Comparisons in Ratings of Happiness

机译:以什么标准快乐?人际和人际比较在幸福感评定中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present research suggests that many of the most commonly-used indicators of happiness are constructed in a manner that renders them susceptible to null or misleading findings. While few happiness indicators specify particular comparison standards, we demonstrate that people tend to evaluate their happiness relative to comparison standards and give reliably different happiness ratings based on the comparison standards they spontaneously adopt. In Study 1, participants reported that intrapersonal comparisons were a more important consideration than interpersonal comparisons in determining their happiness ratings. In Study 2, participants using a free-response format more frequently reported making intrapersonal comparisons than interpersonal comparisons when rating happiness. In both Studies 1 and 2, participants who reported using interpersonal comparisons gave higher happiness ratings than those who reported using intrapersonal comparisons. In Study 3, participants who were prompted to make interpersonal comparisons gave higher happiness ratings than those prompted to make intrapersonal comparisons. We discuss the implications of these findings for measuring subjective well-being and interpreting happiness research.
机译:本研究表明,许多最常用的幸福指标的构建方式使其容易受到无效或误导性发现的影响。尽管很少有幸福指标指定特定的比较标准,但我们证明人们倾向于相对于比较标准评估他们的幸福感,并根据他们自发采用的比较标准给出可靠的不同幸福度等级。在研究1中,参与者报告说,在确定其幸福感等级时,人际比较比人际比较更重要。在研究2中,在对幸福度进行评估时,使用自由回答格式的参与者更频繁地进行人际比较而不是人际比较。在研究1和研究2中,使用人际比较进行报告的参与者的幸福感评分均高于使用人际比较进行报告的参与者。在研究3中,被提示进行人际比较的参与者的幸福感等级高于被提示进行人际比较的参与者。我们讨论了这些发现对测量主观幸福感和解释幸福研究的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号