首页> 外文期刊>Social Indicators Research >Developing Survey Measures of Inequality of Autonomy in the UK
【24h】

Developing Survey Measures of Inequality of Autonomy in the UK

机译:在英国制定自主权不平等调查方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper explores the development of survey questions to measure autonomy, interpreted as the degree of choice and control a person has in key areas of his or her life. A review of the theoretical literature leads to a conceptualisation of autonomy as consisting of three components: (1) self-reflection, (2) active or delegated decision-making, and (3) a wide variety of high-quality options. Three major barriers to autonomy are identified: (1) conditioned expectations, (2) coercion, and (3) structural constraints, including lack of advice and support. A suite of questions designed to assess these components and barriers was devised and subjected to cognitive testing with a purposive sample of 34 individuals with diverse characteristics. The tests resulted in refinements to the language, response categories and phrasing of questions. Analysis of responses indicated that issues of decision-making and range and quality of options were easier for respondents to grasp than questions about self-reflection, and conditioned expectations could be detected only indirectly. Nevertheless the components of, and barriers to, autonomy could be separately identified. The article concludes that despite limitations, survey measurement of the complex concept of autonomy is possible and revealing.
机译:本文探讨了用来衡量自主性的调查问题的发展,这些问题被解释为一个人在生活中关键领域的选择和控制程度。对理论文献的回顾导致对自治的概念化,它由三个部分组成:(1)自我反省,(2)主动或委托的决策,以及(3)各种各样的高质量选择。确定了自治的三个主要障碍:(1)有条件的期望,(2)胁迫和(3)结构性约束,包括缺乏建议和支持。设计了一套旨在评估这些因素和障碍的问题,并针对34名具有不同特征的人进行了有目的的样本的认知测试。测试对语言,回答类别和问题措辞进行了改进。对答复的分析表明,与自我反思的问题相比,受访者更容易掌握决策问题,选择范围和质量等问题,而条件性期望只能间接地被发现。但是,自治的组成部分和障碍可以单独确定。文章得出的结论是,尽管有局限性,但对复杂的自治概念的调查测量仍然是可能的,并且具有启发性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号