...
首页> 外文期刊>Social Dynamics: A journal of African studies >Comorians and Hadramis in the western Indian Ocean: diasporic practices in a comparative context
【24h】

Comorians and Hadramis in the western Indian Ocean: diasporic practices in a comparative context

机译:印度洋西部的科摩罗人和哈德拉米斯人:比较背景下的流散行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Indian Ocean has long been a cosmopolitan place and the circulation of people has, over the centuries, created a web of overlapping transnational networks based on religion, kinship and trade. In this article, I examine the similarities and the differences in diasporic practices and relationships with the homeland using two of these groups - Zanzibaris of Hadrami origin and Zanzibaris of Comorian origin - as case studies. In both cases, relationships with the homeland have differentially shaped practices and identities. These relationships are often ambiguous, since the homeland often wishes to encourage the maintenance of links in order to maintain both remittances and prospects for future emigration, which requires an encouragement of a sense of identity with the homeland on the part of the emigrant community. However, there is reluctance, too, for while emigrants may wish to maintain links with home as a safety mechanism, they may be reluctant to embrace what appear to them to be outdated social practices in the homeland; for those at home, too close an identification with the homeland on the part of the diaspora risks encouraging returns: the loss of remittances and attendant conflicts over resources, particularly land.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdiasporas, mobilities, home, Comorians, Hadramis, ZanzibarRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2012.756722
机译:长期以来,印度洋一直是一个国际大都市,数百年来,人们的流动创造了一个基于宗教,血缘和贸易的,相互重叠的跨国网络。在本文中,我将考察其中两个群体-哈德拉米族的桑给巴尔人和科摩罗人的桑给巴尔人-作为案例研究,来探讨流散性实践与与家园的关系的异同。在这两种情况下,与祖国的关系都有不同的习惯和身份。这些关系通常是模棱两可的,因为家园经常希望鼓励维持联系,以维持汇款和未来移民的前景,这需要鼓励移民社区对家园的认同感。但是,也有勉强,因为虽然移民可能希望与家庭保持联系作为一种安全机制,但他们可能不愿接受他们认为在祖国过时的社会习俗。对于在家中的人来说,散居国外的人与国土之间的距离太近会带来令人鼓舞的回报:汇款损失和随之而来的对资源(特别是土地)的冲突。查看全文下载全文关键字diasporas,mobilities,home,Comorians,Hadramis,Zanzibar var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2012.756722

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号