首页> 外文期刊>Smart Grid, IEEE Transactions on >Plug-in Electric Vehicle Charging With Multiple Charging Options: A Systematic Analysis of Service Providers’ Pricing Strategies
【24h】

Plug-in Electric Vehicle Charging With Multiple Charging Options: A Systematic Analysis of Service Providers’ Pricing Strategies

机译:具有多种充电选项的插入式电动车充电:服务提供商定价策略的系统分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article, we present the optimal strategy for public plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) charging services with multiple charging options: fast charging service and slow charging service. The PEV user make decisions by firstly considering the remaining energy, travel distance to charging station, then about the charging prices, charging rates and estimated charging time. To obtain insights of such a highly coupled system, we consider both monopoly and duopoly markets, where the two services are operated by a single service provider (SP) and two different SPs, respectively. For the monopoly market, we propose a three-stage Stackelberg game model. For the duopoly market, we propose a two-stage Bertrand competition and Cournot competition. We provided the SP’s optimal pricing strategies and decisions in the monopoly market, and the optimal pricing contract and quantity contract for SPs in the duopoly market with Bertrand competition and Cournot competition. Both the analytical and simulation results show that, in the monopoly market, offering two charging options can potentially improve the SP’s profit compared with offering one option only in the monopoly market; while in the duopoly market, it is optimal for SPs to offer the quantity contract rather than the price contract to maximize profits.
机译:本文在本文中,我们为多元充电选项提供了公共插入式电动车(PEV)充电服务的最佳策略:快速充电服务和慢充电服务。 PEV用户首先考虑剩余能量,对充电站的旅行距离进行决定,然后是收费价格,充电率和估计充电时间。为了获得这种高耦合系统的见解,我们考虑垄断和双垄市场,两种服务分别由单个服务提供商(SP)和两个不同的SPS运营。对于垄断市场来说,我们提出了一个三阶段的Stackelberg游戏模型。对于Dupoly Market,我们提出了一个两级的Bertrand比赛和法庭竞争。我们在垄断市场提供了SP的最佳定价策略和决策,以及与Bertrand比赛和Cournot竞争的Duoply Market中SPS的最佳定价合同和数量合同。分析和仿真结果均表明,在垄断市场中,与仅在垄断市场中提供一个选项相比,提供两个收费选项可能会提高SP的利润;在双浦市场,对于SP来说,提供数量合同而不是价格合同来最大限度地提高利润。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Smart Grid, IEEE Transactions on》 |2021年第1期|524-537|共14页
  • 作者单位

    College of Computer Science and Engineering University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu China;

    College of Computer Science Sichuan University Chengdu China;

    College of Computer Science and Software Engineering Shenzhen University Shenzhen China;

    College of Computer Science and Engineering University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu China;

    College of Computer Science and Engineering University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu China;

    College of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton U.K.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Monopoly; Contracts; Pricing; Charging stations; Games; Oligopoly; Throughput;

    机译:垄断;合同;定价;充电站;游戏;寡头垄断;吞吐量;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号