...
首页> 外文期刊>Signal processing >AR and ARMA model order selection for time-series modeling with ImageNet classification
【24h】

AR and ARMA model order selection for time-series modeling with ImageNet classification

机译:AR和ARMA模型订单选择与Imagenet分类的时间序列建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We propose model order selection methods for autoregressive (AR) and autoregressive moving average (ARMA) time-series modeling based on ImageNet classifications with a 2-dimensional convolutional neural network (2-D CNN). We designed two models for two realistic scenarios: (1) a general model which emulates the scenario that validation and test datasets do not necessarily have the same dynamics as the training data, (2) a specific model which emulates the opposite scenario-the validation and test datasets share the dynamics of the training data. The results were compared to those of both Akaike Information criterion (A1C) and Bayesian Information criterion (BIC). Using simulation examples, we trained 2-D CNN-based Inception-v3 and ResNet50-v2 models for either AR or ARMA order selection for each of the two scenarios. The proposed ResNet50-v2 to use both time-frequency and the original time series data outperformed AIC and BIC for all scenarios. For the general model, the average of relative error reduction (ARER) when compared to the BIC method in the clean and three noisy environments was 19.07% (±14.22%) for the AR order for an AR process, and 5.67% (±2.83%) for the ARMA order for an ARMA process. The ARERs significantly improved to 73.92% (±30.95%) and 65.58% (±38.61%) for the AR and ARMA models, respectively, for the specific model scenario.
机译:我们提出了自回归(AR)模型阶选择方法和自回归移动平均(ARMA)时间序列基于ImageNet建模二维卷积神经网络分类(2-d CNN)。我们为两个现实场景设计了两个模型:(1)仿真和测试数据集不一定具有与训练数据相同的动态的常规模型,(2)模拟相反场景的特定模型 - 验证测试数据集共享培训数据的动态。将结果与Akaike信息标准(A1C)和贝叶斯信息标准(BIC)进行比较。使用仿真示例,我们培训了基于2-D CNN的Inception-V3和Reset50-V2模型,用于两个场景中的每一个的AR或ARMA订单选择。建议的ResET50-V2使用时频和原始时间序列数据的所有场景都能表现优于AIC和BIC。对于一般模型,与干净和三个嘈杂环境中的BIC方法相比相对误差减少(ARER)的平均值为AR工艺的AR命令为19.07%(±14.22%),5.67%(±2.83 %)用于ARMA流程的ARMA命令。对于特定模型方案,AR和ARMA模型分别显着提高到AR和ARMA模型的73.92%(±30.95%)和65.58%(±38.61%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号