首页> 外文期刊>SIGCSE bulletin >Introductory Programming, Criterion-Referencing, and Bloom
【24h】

Introductory Programming, Criterion-Referencing, and Bloom

机译:入门编程,标准引用和Bloom

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the traditional norm-referencing approach to grading, all students in a CS1 class attempt the same programming tasks, and those attempts are graded "to a curve". The danger is that such tasks are aimed at a hypothetical average student. Weaker students can do little of these tasks, and learn little. Meanwhile, these tasks do not stretch the stronger students, so they too are denied an opportunity to learn. Our solution is two-fold. First, we use a criterion-referenced approach, where fundamentally different tasks are set, according to the ability of the students. Second, the differences in the nature of the tasks reflect the differing levels of Bloom's taxonomy. Weaker CS1 students are simply required to demonstrate knowledge and comprehension; the ability to read and understand programs. Middling students attempt traditional tasks, while the stronger students are set open-ended tasks at the synthesis and evaluation levels.
机译:在传统的评分标准参考方法中,CS1班的所有学生都尝试相同的编程任务,而这些尝试均被“曲线化”。危险在于此类任务针对假设的普通学生。较弱的学生几乎无法完成这些任务,也学到很少。同时,这些任务并不能使较强的学生受益,因此他们也被剥夺了学习的机会。我们的解决方案有两个方面。首先,我们使用标准参考方法,根据学生的能力,设置根本不同的任务。第二,任务性质的差异反映了Bloom分类法的不同水平。仅要求CS1较弱的学生展示知识和理解力即可;阅读和理解程序的能力。中等水平的学生尝试传统任务,而较强的学生则在综合和评估级别设置开放式任务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号