$^{circ}~{rm LiNbO}_{3}$ are investigated and compared. The cou'/> Comparison of Acoustic Wave Sensors With Different Cut <formula formulatype='inline'> src='/images/tex/18822.gif' alt='{rm LiNbO}_{3}'> </formula> Working on Pseudo-LFE Mode
首页> 外文期刊>Sensors Journal, IEEE >Comparison of Acoustic Wave Sensors With Different Cut src='/images/tex/18822.gif' alt='{rm LiNbO}_{3}'> Working on Pseudo-LFE Mode
【24h】

Comparison of Acoustic Wave Sensors With Different Cut src='/images/tex/18822.gif' alt='{rm LiNbO}_{3}'> Working on Pseudo-LFE Mode

机译:具有不同切割的声波传感器的比较 src =“ / images / tex / 18822.gif” alt =“ {rm LiNbO} _ {3}”> 在伪上工作-LFE模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, two pseudo-LFE devices made up of X-cut and (yxl) 21.82$^{circ}~{rm LiNbO}_{3}$ are investigated and compared. The coupling factors of both devices are calculated and the impedance characteristics are tested by impedance analyzer. The sensitivity and stability of both devices to the electrical property changes of liquid are also tested in isopropanol-water and NaCl-water solution. We find that the X-cut ${rm LiNbO}_{3}$ device has a higher piezoelectric coupling factor and better resonance in the deionized water than (yxl) 21.82$^{circ}~{rm LiNbO}_{3}$ device. The results also show that X-cut ${rm LiNbO}_{3}$ devices are more sensitive to the change of liquid conductivity and permittivity than (yxl) 21.82$^{circ}~{rm LiNbO}_{3}$ device even with similar stability.
机译:在本文中,两个伪LFE器件由X-cut和(yxl)21.82 $ ^ {circ}〜{rm LiNbO} _ {3}组成$ 进行了调查和比较。计算两个设备的耦合因子,并通过阻抗分析仪测试阻抗特性。还在异丙醇-水溶液和NaCl-水溶液中测试了两种设备对液体电性能变化的敏感性和稳定性。我们发现X切 $ {rm LiNbO} _ {3} $ 器件具有更高的压电耦合系数和更好的压电耦合系数。去离子水中的共振比(yxl)21.82 $ ^ {circ}〜{rm LiNbO} _ {3} $ 设备。结果还显示,X切割 $ {rm LiNbO} _ {3} $ 设备对以下参数的更改更敏感:液体电导率和介电常数比(yxl)21.82 $ ^ {circ}〜{rm LiNbO} _ {3} $ 甚至具有相似的稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号