...
首页> 外文期刊>Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, IEEE Journal of >A Comparative Land-Cover Classification Feature Study of Learning Algorithms: DBM, PCA, and RF Using Multispectral LiDAR Data
【24h】

A Comparative Land-Cover Classification Feature Study of Learning Algorithms: DBM, PCA, and RF Using Multispectral LiDAR Data

机译:使用多光谱LiDAR数据的学习算法(DBM,PCA和RF)的土地覆盖分类比较特征研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Multispectral LiDAR, characterization of completeness, and consistency of spectrum and spatial geometric data provide a new data source for land cover classification. However, how to choose the optimal features for a given set of land covers is an open problem for effective land cover classification. To address this problem, we propose a comparative scheme, which investigates a popular deep learning (deep Boltzmann machine, DBM) model for high-level feature representation and widely used machine learning methods for low-level feature extraction and selection [principal component analysis (PCA) and random forest (RF)] in land cover classification. The comparative study was conducted on the multispectral LiDAR point clouds, acquired by a Teledyne Optech's Titan airborne system. The deep learning-based highlevel feature representation experimental results showed that, on an ordinary personal computer or workstation, this method required larger training samples andmore computational complexity than the machine learning-based low-level feature extraction and selection methods. However, our comparative experiments demonstrated that the classification accuracies of the DBM-based method were higher than those of the RF-based and PCA-based methods using multispectral LiDAR data.
机译:多光谱LiDAR,完整性的表征以及光谱和空间几何数据的一致性为土地覆被分类提供了新的数据源。但是,如何为给定的土地覆盖物选择最佳特征是有效的土地覆盖物分类的未解决问题。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个比较方案,该方案研究了流行的用于高级特征表示的深度学习(deep Boltzmann机,DBM)模型和用于低级特征提取和选择的广泛使用的机器学习方法[主要成分分析( PCA)和随机森林(RF)]。比较研究是在由Teledyne Optech的Titan机载系统获取的多光谱LiDAR点云上进行的。基于深度学习的高级特征表示实验结果表明,与基于机器学习的低级特征提取和选择方法相比,该方法在普通的个人计算机或工作站上需要更大的训练样本和更高的计算复杂度。但是,我们的对比实验表明,使用多光谱LiDAR数据的基于DBM的方法的分类精度高于基于RF和基于PCA的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号