...
首页> 外文期刊>Security Index: A Russian Journal on International Security >INTERNET GOVERNANCE: POLITICS AND GEOPOLITICS
【24h】

INTERNET GOVERNANCE: POLITICS AND GEOPOLITICS

机译:互联网治理:政治与地缘政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is no longer any need these days to begin an article about Internet technology by recounting the history of the Net's creation or by explaining why it is so important for human civilization. The Internet is now part of everyday lives for most of the people on this planet. Network technologies are an integral part of the economy. “Electronic government” (or to be more precise, electronic interaction between the government, society and citizens) no longer seems an exotic privilege of technologically advanced countries. Of course, the penetration rate of Internet technologies varies from country to country, for a whole number of reasons. These reasons, as well as the various consequences of the rapid development of the Internet, have been the subject of numerous studies in areas such as technology, macroeconomics, culture, law, philosophy and even religion—several religious groups have already sprung up whose members maintain contact only via the Net. But the question that often remains unasked is, who governs all this multitude of electronic communications, data transfer protocols and domain name registration systems? That question is becoming especially important now that the Internet, unfortunately, is increasingly being used as a weapon in information wars—a weapon of “mass destruction” or a weapon for “surgical strikes”. The Georgian-Ossetian military conflict that broke out in the summer of 2008 saw widespread use of Internet technologies for propaganda purposes (which, admittedly, was not the first time that this had happened). What is more, entire “hostile” domains on the territory of one of the participants in the conflict came under attack. It is quite indicative that the country that effected such a radical restriction of freedom of information was no other than Georgia, whose leaders like to call themselves “the bulwark of democracy in the confrontation with imperialist Russia.” Meanwhile, in Russia itself no punitive measures were undertaken again any segments of the Internet, including the Georgia websites.The purpose of this article is to analyze the current situation concerning Internet governance on the global scale, and the attendant political and geopolitical problems.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19934271003595111
机译:这些天不再需要通过回顾网络的创建历史或解释为什么它对人类文明如此重要来开始有关互联网技术的文章。对于这个星球上的大多数人来说,互联网现在已经成为他们日常生活的一部分。网络技术是经济不可或缺的一部分。 “电子政府”(或更确切地说,是政府,社会和公民之间的电子互动)似乎不再是技术先进国家的特权。当然,由于多种原因,互联网技术的渗透率因国家而异。这些原因以及互联网快速发展所带来的各种后果,已成为技术,宏观经济学,文化,法律,哲学甚至宗教等领域众多研究的主题-几个宗教团体已经如雨后春笋般涌现。成员仅通过网络保持联系。但是,通常仍未解决的问题是,谁来管理所有众多电子通信,数据传输协议和域名注册系统?不幸的是,现在,这个问题变得尤为重要,因为互联网正越来越多地被用作信息战中的一种武器,即“大规模毁灭性武器”或“外科手术打击”武器。 2008年夏天爆发的格鲁吉亚与奥塞梯军事冲突使互联网技术广泛用于宣传目的(诚然,这不是第一次发生这种情况)。此外,冲突参与者之一的领土上的整个“敌对”域都受到了攻击。充分表明,对信息自由实施如此严格限制的国家只有格鲁吉亚,格鲁吉亚的领导人喜欢称自己为“与帝国主义俄罗斯对抗的民主堡垒”。与此同时,在俄罗斯本身没有对互联网的任何部分(包括乔治亚州的网站)再次采取惩罚措施。本文的目的是分析全球范围内有关互联网治理的现状以及随之而来的政治和地缘政治问题。查看全文下载全文相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19934271003595111

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号