...
首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Assessing The Ability Of Mechanistic Volatilization Models To Simulate Soil Surface Conditions A Study With The Volt'air Model
【24h】

Assessing The Ability Of Mechanistic Volatilization Models To Simulate Soil Surface Conditions A Study With The Volt'air Model

机译:评估机械挥发模型模拟土壤表面状况的能力借助Volt'air模型进行研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ammonia and pesticide volatilization in the field is a surface phenomenon involving physical and chemical processes that depend on the soil surface temperature and water content. The water transfer, heat transfer and energy budget sub models of volatilization models are adapted from the most commonly accepted formalisms and parameterizations. They are less detailed than the dedicated models describing water and heat transfers and surface status. The aim of this work was to assess the ability of one of the available mechanistic volatilization models, Volt'Air, to accurately describe the pedo-climatic conditions of a soil surface at the required time and space resolution. The assessment involves: (i) a sensitivity analysis, (ii) an evaluation of Volt'Air outputs in the light of outputs from a reference Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere Transfer model (SiSPAT) and three experimental datasets, and (iii) the study of three tests based on modifications of SiSPAT to establish the potential impact of the simplifying assumptions used in Volt'Air. The analysis confirmed that a 5 mm surface layer was well suited, and that Volt'Air surface temperature correlated well with the experimental measurements as well as with SiSPAT outputs. In terms of liquid water transfers, Volt'Air was overall consistent with SiSPAT, with discrepancies only during major rainfall events and dry weather conditions. The tests enabled us to identify the main source of the discrepancies between Volt'Air and SiSPAT: the lack of gaseous water transfer description in Volt'Air. They also helped to explain why neither Volt'Air nor SiSPAT was able to represent lower values of surface water content: current classical water retention and hydraulic conductivity models are not yet adapted to cases of very dry conditions. Given the outcomes of this study, we discuss to what extent the volatilization models can be improved and the questions they pose for current research in water transfer modeling and parameterization.
机译:农田中的氨和农药挥发是一种表面现象,涉及取决于土壤表面温度和水分的物理和化学过程。挥发模型的水传递,热传递和能量收支子模型是从最普遍接受的形式主义和参数化改编而成的。它们不如描述水和热传递以及表面状态的专用模型详细。这项工作的目的是评估可用的机械挥发模型之一Volt'Air在所需的时间和空间分辨率下准确描述土壤表面的人为气候条件的能力。评估包括:(i)敏感性分析,(ii)根据参考的土壤-植被-大气转移模型(SiSPAT)和三个实验数据集的输出评估Volt'Air的输出,以及(iii)研究基于SiSPAT修改的三项测试中的三项测试,以确定Volt'Air中使用的简化假设的潜在影响。分析证实了5毫米的表面层非常合适,Volt'Air的表面温度与实验测量以及SiSPAT输出之间的相关性很好。在液态水输送方面,Volt'Air总体上与SiSPAT一致,仅在主要降雨事件和干燥天气条件下存在差异。这些测试使我们能够确定Volt'Air与SiSPAT之间差异的主要原因:Volt'Air中缺少气态水转移描述。他们还帮助解释了为什么Volt'Air和SiSPAT都不能代表较低的地表水含量:当前的经典保水率和水力传导率模型尚未适应非常干燥的情况。鉴于这项研究的结果,我们讨论了在多大程度上可以改善挥发模型,以及它们对水转移模型和参数化当前研究提出的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号