首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Benthic macroinvertebrates in lake ecological assessment: A review of methods, intercalibration and practical recommendations
【24h】

Benthic macroinvertebrates in lake ecological assessment: A review of methods, intercalibration and practical recommendations

机译:底栖大型无脊椎动物在湖泊生态评估中的应用:方法,相互校准和实用建议的回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Legislation in Europe has been adopted to determine and improve the ecological integrity of inland and coastal waters. Assessment is based on four biotic groups, including benthic macroinvertebrate communities. For lakes, benthic invertebrates have been recognized as one of the most difficult organism groups to use in ecological assessment, and hitherto their use in ecological assessment has been limited. In this study, we review and intercalibrate 13 benthic invertebrate-based tools across Europe. These assessment tools address different human impacts: acidification (3 methods), eutrophication (3 methods), morphological alterations (2 methods), and a combination of the last two (5 methods). For intercalibration, the methods were grouped into four intercalibration groups, according to the habitat sampled and putative pressure. Boundaries of the 'good ecological status' were compared and harmonized using direct or indirect comparison approaches. To enable indirect comparison of the methods, three common pressure indices and two common biological multimetric indices were developed for larger geographical areas. Additionally, we identified the best-performing methods based on their responsiveness to different human impacts. Based on these experiences, we provide practical recommendations for the development and harmonization of benthic invertebrate assessment methods in lakes and similar habitats.
机译:欧洲已通过立法确定和改善内陆和沿海水域的生态完整性。评估基于四个生物种群,包括底栖大型无脊椎动物群落。对于湖泊,底栖无脊椎动物被公认为是生态评估中最难使用的生物体之一,迄今为止,它们在生态评估中的使用受到限制。在这项研究中,我们回顾并校准了欧洲13种基于底栖无脊椎动物的工具。这些评估工具解决了不同的人类影响:酸化(3种方法),富营养化(3种方法),形态变化(2种方法)以及后两种的组合(5种方法)。对于相互校准,根据采样的栖息地和推定压力将方法分为四个相互校准组。使用直接或间接比较方法比较并协调了“良好生态状态”的边界。为了能够间接比较这些方法,针对较大的地理区域开发了三个通用压力指数和两个通用生物多指标指数。此外,我们基于对不同人类影响的响应能力,确定了性能最佳的方法。基于这些经验,我们为湖泊和类似栖息地底栖无脊椎动物评估方法的开发和协调提供实用建议。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Science of the Total Environment》 |2016年第1期|123-134|共12页
  • 作者单位

    European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Water Resources Unit, 21027 Ispra, Italy;

    Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7050, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden;

    Institute of Freshwater Research, Department of Aquatic Resources, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Stangholmsvaegen 2, SE-178 93 Drottningholm, Sweden;

    Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Gaustadalleen 21, 0349 Oslo, Norway;

    Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy;

    Institute for Water of the Republic of Slovenia, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;

    Nature Research Centre, Akademijos Str. 2, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania;

    Freshwater Centre, Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, 90014 Oulu, Finland;

    Flemish Environment Agency, Department Water Monitoring, De Moorstraat 24-26, B-9300 Aalst, Belgium;

    Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IHB), Mueggelseedamm 301, 12587 Berlin, Germany;

    Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IHB), Mueggelseedamm 301, 12587 Berlin, Germany;

    Centre for Limnology, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 61117 Rannu, Tartumaa, Estonia;

    Bioforum GmbH, Sudetenstr. 34, 73230 Kirchheim/Teck, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Biological metrics; Benthic invertebrates; Ecological assessment; Lakes; Water Framework Directive; Pressure-response relationships;

    机译:生物学指标;底栖无脊椎动物;生态评估;湖泊水框架指令;压力响应关系;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号