...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Influences of observation method, season, soil depth, land use and management practice on soil dissolvable organic carbon concentrations: A meta-analysis
【24h】

Influences of observation method, season, soil depth, land use and management practice on soil dissolvable organic carbon concentrations: A meta-analysis

机译:观测方法,季节,土壤深度,土地利用和管理实践对土壤可溶性有机碳浓度的影响:荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Quantifications of soil dissolvable organic carbon concentrations, together with other relevant variables, are needed to understand the carbon biogeochemistry of terrestrial ecosystems. Soil dissolvable organic carbon can generally be grouped into two incomparable categories. One is soil extractable organic carbon (EOC), which is measured by extracting with an aqueous extractant (distilled water or a salt solution). The other is soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which is measured by sampling soil water using tension-free lysimeters or tension samplers. The influences of observation methods, natural factors and management practices on the measured concentrations, which ranged from 2.5−3970 (mean: 69) mg kg−1of EOC and 0.4−200 (mean: 12) mg L−1of DOC, were investigated through a meta-analysis. The observation methods (e.g., extractant, extractant-to-soil ratio and pre-treatment) had significant effects on EOC concentrations. The most significant divergence (approximately 109%) occurred especially at the extractant of potassium sulfate (K2SO4) solutions compared to distilled water. As EOC concentrations were significantly different (approximately 47%) between non-cultivated and cultivated soils, they were more suitable than DOC concentrations for assessing the influence of land use on soil dissolvable organic carbon levels. While season did not significantly affect EOC concentrations, DOC concentrations showed significant differences (approximately 50%) in summer and autumn compared to spring. For management practices, applications of crop residues and nitrogen fertilizers showed positive effects (approximately 23% to 91%) on soil EOC concentrations, while tillage displayed negative effects (approximately −17%), compared to no straw, no nitrogen fertilizer and no tillage. Compared to no nitrogen, applications of synthetic nitrogen also appeared to significantly enhance DOC concentrations (approximately 32%). However, further studies are needed in the future to confirm/investigate the effects of ecosystem management practices using standardized EOC measurement protocols or more DOC cases of field experiments.
机译:需要对土壤可溶性有机碳浓度以及其他相关变量进行定量分析,以了解陆地生态系统的碳生物地球化学。土壤可溶解的有机碳通常可分为两类。一种是土壤可提取的有机碳(EOC),其通过用含水萃取剂(蒸馏水或盐溶液)萃取来测量。另一个是土壤溶解的有机碳(DOC),它是通过使用无张力测渗仪或张力采样器对土壤水进行采样来测量的。通过以下方法研究了观测方法,自然因素和管理实践对所测浓度的影响:EOC的浓度范围为2.5-3970(平均值:69)mg kg-1,DOC的浓度范围为0.4-200(平均值:12)mg L-1。荟萃分析。观察方法(例如萃取剂,萃取剂与土壤的比率和预处理)对EOC浓度有重大影响。与蒸馏水相比,尤其在硫酸钾(K2SO4)溶液的萃取剂中,出现了最大的差异(大约109%)。由于未耕种土壤和耕作土壤之间的EOC浓度差异显着(大约47%),因此它们比DOC浓度更适合评估土地利用对土壤可溶性有机碳水平的影响。尽管季节对EOC浓度没有明显影响,但夏季和秋季与春季相比,DOC浓度显示出显着差异(约50%)。在管理实践中,与没有秸秆,没有氮肥和没有耕作的耕作相比,施用农作物残余物和氮肥对土壤中的EOC浓度表现出积极影响(约23%至91%),而耕作则表现出负面影响(约-17%)。 。与不使用氮相比,使用合成氮似乎还可以显着提高DOC浓度(约32%)。但是,将来需要进一步的研究,以使用标准的EOC测量协议或更多DOC现场试验案例来确认/调查生态系统管理实践的效果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Science of the Total Environment》 |2018年第1期|105-114|共10页
  • 作者单位

    State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;

    State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;

    State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences;

    State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences;

    State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences;

    State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Soil dissolvable organic carbon; Observation method; Land use; Season; Management practice;

    机译:土壤可溶性有机碳;观测方法;土地利用;季节;管理实践;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号