Abstract On-road and laboratory emissions of NO, NO_2, NH_3, N_2O and CH_4 from late-model EU light utility vehicles: Comparison of diesel and CNG
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >On-road and laboratory emissions of NO, NO_2, NH_3, N_2O and CH_4 from late-model EU light utility vehicles: Comparison of diesel and CNG
【24h】

On-road and laboratory emissions of NO, NO_2, NH_3, N_2O and CH_4 from late-model EU light utility vehicles: Comparison of diesel and CNG

机译:欧盟最新型轻型多功能车在道路和实验室排放的NO,NO_2,NH_3,N_2O和CH_4:柴油和CNG的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AbstractExhaust emissions of eight Euro 6 light duty vehicles – two station wagons and six vans – half powered by diesel fuel and half by compressed natural gas (CNG) were examined using both chassis dynamometer and on-road testing. A portable on-board FTIR analyzer was used to measure concentrations of reactive nitrogen compounds – NO, NO2and ammonia, of CO, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and greenhouse gases CO2, methane and N2O. Exhaust flow was inferred from engine control unit data. Total emissions per cycle were compared and found to be in good agreement with laboratory measurements of NOX, CO and CO2during dynamometer tests. On diesel engines, mean NOXemissions were 136–1070mg/km in the laboratory and 537–615mg/km on the road, in many cases nearly an order of magnitude higher compared to the numerical value of the Euro 6 limit. Mean N2O emissions were 3–19mg/km and were equivalent to several g/km CO2. The measurements suggest that NOXand N2O emissions from late-model European light utility vehicles with diesel engines are non-negligible and should be continuously assessed and scrutinized. High variances in NOXemissions among the tested diesel vehicles suggest that large number of vehicles should be tested to offer at least some insights about distribution of fleet emissions among vehicles. CNG engines exhibited relatively low emissions of NOX(12–186mg/km) and NH3(10–24mg/km), while mean emissions of methane were 18–45mg/km, under 1g/km CO2equivalent, and N2O, CO, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were negligible. The combination of a relatively clean-burning fuel, modern engine technology and a three-way catalyst has resulted in relatively low emissions under the wide variety of operating conditions encountered during the tests. The on-board FTIR has proven to be a useful instrument capable of covering, with the exception of total hydrocarbons, essentially all gaseous pollutants of interest.Graphical abstractDisplay OmittedHighlightsOn-board FTIR used to measure real-world emissions from diesel and CNG Euro 6 vansDiesel vans produced hundreds of mg/km NOx, little NH3, tens of mg/km N2O.CNG vans produced tens of mg/km NOxand NH3, little N2O, methane, aldehydes.FTIR useful for assessment of classic and unregulated gases incl. NO2, NH3, N2O, CH4NOx, NO2, NH3, greenhouse gas emissions assessment needed also for small vans, trucks
机译: 摘要 八辆欧6轻型汽车(两辆旅行车和六辆货车)的尾气排放量,一半用柴油驱动,一半用压缩天然气驱动(CNG)使用底盘测功机和道路测试进行了检查。使用便携式车载FTIR分析仪测量反应性氮化合物(NO,NO 2 )的浓度以及一氧化碳,甲醛,乙醛和温室气体中的氨 2 ,甲烷和N 2 O。从发动机控制单元数据推断出排气流量。比较每个循环的总排放量,发现与NO X ,CO和CO 2的实验室测量值非常吻合在测功机测试期间。在柴油发动机上,实验室中的平均NO X 排放量为136-1070mg / km,道路上的平均排放量为537-615mg / km,在许多情况下,约为相较于欧6限值的数值,其幅度要大得多。平均N 2 O排放量为3–19mg / km,相当于几克/公里CO 2 。测量结果表明,欧洲新型公用事业公司的NO X 和N 2 O排放柴油发动机的车辆不可忽略,应进行持续评估和审查。被测柴油车中NO X 排放量的高差异表明,应对大量车辆进行测试,以至少提供有关车队排放量在车辆中分布的一些见解。 CNG发动机的NO X (12–186mg / km)和NH 3 相对较低>(10–24mg / km),而甲烷的平均排放量为18–45mg / km,低于1g / km的CO 2 当量,而N 2 O,CO,甲醛和乙醛微不足道。在测试过程中遇到的各种运行条件下,相对清洁的燃料,现代发动机技术和三元催化器的结合导致了较低的排放。事实证明,机载FTIR是一种有用的工具,能够覆盖除碳氢化合物外的几乎所有感兴趣的气态污染物。 图形摘要 省略显示 突出显示 板载FTIR用于测量柴油和CNG欧6厢式货车的全球排放量 < ce:para id =“ p0010” view =“ all”>柴油货车产生数百毫克/公里的NO x ,少量NH 3 ,几十毫克/公里N 2 O。 CNG货车产生数十毫克/公里的NO x 和NH 3 ,小N 2 O,甲烷,醛。 FTIR可用于评估经典和不受管制的气体,包括NO 2 ,NH 3 ,N 2 O,CH 4 x ,否< ce:inf loc =“ post”> 2 ,NH 3 ,小型货车,卡车也需要进行温室气体排放评估

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号