...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and technology of nuclear installation >Cost Estimation and Efficiency Analysis of Korean CANDU Spent Fuel Disposal Alternatives in Consideration of Future Price Volatility
【24h】

Cost Estimation and Efficiency Analysis of Korean CANDU Spent Fuel Disposal Alternatives in Consideration of Future Price Volatility

机译:考虑未来价格波动的韩国CANDU乏燃料处置替代品的成本估算和效率分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Korea, spent fuel is temporarily stored in spent fuel pools at nuclear reactor sites and it is predicted to become saturated between 2020 and 2024. For this reason, four disposal alternatives (KRS-1, A-KRS-1, A-KRS-21, and A-KRS-22) have been developed in order to carry out the direct disposal of the CANDU spent fuel. The objective of this study is to conduct cost efficiency analysis of the disposal alternatives in consideration of price volatility for the radioactive waste repository. To derive future price volatility, this study used the ARIMA model. As a result, A-KRS-1 is the most efficient in terms of price per bundle using 2015 price. As for the results using ARIMA model, except in the case of KRS-1, the cost per bundle of A-KRS-1, A-KRS-21, and A-KRS-22 is decreased. Cost estimation using ARIMA model shows little change or decreases in cost while cost estimation using inflation rates for 2020 resulted in approximately 7.2% increases compared to 2015 for all options. As for the results of scenario analysis, A-KRS-1 earned 8,160 points, while A-KRS-22 followed closely behind with 7,980 points among the total 24,300 points. The results of this study provide invaluable policy data for any nation considering the construction of spent nuclear fuel repository.
机译:在韩国,乏燃料被临时存储在核反应堆站点的乏燃料池中,预计在2020年至2024年间将达到饱和。因此,有四种处置选择(KRS-1,A-KRS-1,A-KRS-为了进行CANDU乏燃料的直接处置,已经开发出了21型和A-KRS-22)。这项研究的目的是在考虑放射性废物处置库价格波动的情况下对处置替代品进行成本效益分析。为了得出未来的价格波动,本研究使用ARIMA模型。结果,就使用2015年价格计算的每捆价格而言,A-KRS-1效率最高。至于使用ARIMA模型的结果,除了在KRS-1的情况下,每捆A-KRS-1,A-KRS-21和A-KRS-22的成本都降低了。使用ARIMA模型的成本估算显示成本几乎没有变化或下降,而使用通胀率估算的2020年所有方案的成本估算比2015年增加了7.2%。至于情景分析的结果,A-KRS-1获得了8,160点,而A-KRS-22在24,300点中紧随其后,获得7,980点。这项研究的结果为考虑建造乏核燃料库的任何国家提供了宝贵的政策数据。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and technology of nuclear installation》 |2016年第2016期|3967572.1-3967572.9|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Business & Technol Management, 291 Daehak Ro, Daejeon 34141, South Korea;

    Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Business & Technol Management, 291 Daehak Ro, Daejeon 34141, South Korea;

    Pukyong Natl Univ, Grad Sch Management Technol, 365 Sinseon Ro, Busan 48547, South Korea;

    Korea Inst Energy Res, 152 Gajeong Ro, Daejeon 34129, South Korea;

    Korea Inst Energy Res, 152 Gajeong Ro, Daejeon 34129, South Korea;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号