...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >Technology assessment at the German Bundestag: 'expertising' democracy for 'democratising' expertise
【24h】

Technology assessment at the German Bundestag: 'expertising' democracy for 'democratising' expertise

机译:德国联邦议院的技术评估:“专业化”民主与“民主化”专业知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Taking the example of the consultation of experts in processes of parliamentary decision-making, this article shows how it is possible to support democratic processes by means of the institutional and organisational type of technology assessment (TA) chosen by the German Bundestag. Members of the Bundestag often find it difficult to discern on which premises and preconditions expert knowledge is based. They are quite often helpless facing the 'experts' dilemma', consisting of the confrontation of expertise and counter-expertise. The questions to be dealt with are, how TA as advice to the legislature deals with this situation, what kind of experience has been gained with it, and what are the limitations.
机译:以议会决策过程中的专家咨询为例,本文显示了如何通过德国联邦议院选择的制度和组织类型的技术评估(TA)来支持民主进程。联邦议院议员经常发现很难分辨专家知识所基于的前提和前提。他们常常无可奈何地面对“专家”的困境,其中包括专业知识和反专家的对抗。需要解决的问题是,如何向立法机构提供技术援助,以解决这种情况,从中获得了什么样的经验以及局限性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and Public Policy》 |2003年第3期|p. 193-198|共6页
  • 作者

    Armin Grunwald;

  • 作者单位

    Institut fur Technikfol-genabschatzung and Systemanalyse (ITAS), Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Postfach 36 40, 76021 Karlsruhe, Deutschland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学总论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号