...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >'Democratising' expertise, 'expertising' democracy: what does this mean, and why bother?
【24h】

'Democratising' expertise, 'expertising' democracy: what does this mean, and why bother?

机译:“民主化”专业知识,“专业化”民主:这意味着什么,为什么要打扰?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

What is the role of participatory processes in decision-making related to science and technology and in any other area where knowledge and expert advice play an important role? Can expert advice to policy makers be more transparent and accountable/ This introduction discusses these and other connected questions under the provocative label of 'democratising expertise. It highlights and explores the variety of linkages between governance and knowledge that are presented by the authors of this special issue. The result is a complex landscape of still unresolved issues of coexistence and conflict.
机译:参与过程在与科学和技术有关的决策中以及在知识和专家建议发挥重要作用的任何其他领域中起什么作用?向决策者提供的专家建议可以更加透明和负责任吗?本简介以“民主专业化”的挑衅性标签讨论了这些问题和其他相关问题。它突出并探讨了本期特刊作者提出的治理与知识之间的各种联系。结果是仍然存在并存和冲突问题的复杂局面。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and Public Policy》 |2003年第3期|p. 146-150|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Directorate General for Research-Unit of Research on Social Sciences and the Humanities, European Commission, SDME 4/55, Rue de la Loi 200, B-1049 Brussels, Belgium;

    Head of Knowledge Assessment Methodologies (KAM), Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen (IPSC), European Commission-Joint Research Centre (EC-RC), TP 268, 21020 Ispra (VA), Italy;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学总论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号