...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >Environmental science and public policy in Executive government: Insights from Australia and Canada
【24h】

Environmental science and public policy in Executive government: Insights from Australia and Canada

机译:行政政府中的环境科学与公共政策:澳大利亚和加拿大的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents the results of an exploratory study into the science-policy experiences of former Environment Ministers (senior politicians) and Department Secretaries/Deputy Ministers (senior public servants) to better understand the role of science-based knowledge in the Executive decision-making processes of Westminster-based governments. Our participants identified a number of factors affecting the value of science-based evidence to strategic public policy processes. They described a lack of access to appropriately contextualized knowledge and a lack of accountability to demonstrate how science was considered in Cabinet decision-making. Many participants felt senior academics had an obligation to be more involved in public policy debates, to advocate policy positions based on their research and to ask questions that could assist governments on environmental issues. Concomitant was the desire for fundamental institutional changes, including greater use of deliberative public participation tools in environmental science and policy and more networked approaches to science.
机译:本文介绍了对前环境部长(高级政客)和部门秘书/副部长(高级公务员)的科学政策经验进行探索性研究的结果,以更好地理解基于科学的知识在行政决策中的作用威斯敏斯特政府的程序。我们的参与者确定了许多因素,这些因素会影响基于科学的证据对战略性公共政策流程的价值。他们描述了缺乏获得适当背景知识的途径,也缺乏问责制来证明内阁决策中如何考虑科学。许多与会者认为,高级学者有义务更多地参与公共政策辩论,有义务根据他们的研究主张政策立场,并提出可以帮助政府解决环境问题的问题。随之而来的是对根本机构变革的渴望,包括在环境科学和政策中更多地使用协商性公众参与工具以及更加科学的网络方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号