首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >Evaluating technology oversight through multiple frameworks: a case study of genetically engineered cotton in India
【24h】

Evaluating technology oversight through multiple frameworks: a case study of genetically engineered cotton in India

机译:通过多个框架评估技术监督:以印度转基因棉花为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Oversight systems for emerging technologies involve a diversity of institutions, stakeholders, and goals; yet they are usually based upon one or a few perspectives. This paper uses a multi-framework approach to evaluate the oversight system for genetically engineered organisms in India. It uses four established frameworks — policy options, risk assessment, risk management and regulatory oversight — and ethics, to assess strengths and weaknesses of the system. Through the case study, the authors argue that multiple frameworks should be used in the design and evaluation of oversight systems for emerging technologies.
机译:新兴技术的监督系统涉及各种机构,利益相关者和目标;但是它们通常基于一种或几种观点。本文采用多框架方法来评估印度的基因工程生物监督体系。它使用四个已建立的框架(策略选项,风险评估,风险管理和监管监督)以及道德规范来评估系统的优缺点。通过案例研究,作者认为,在新兴技术监督系统的设计和评估中应使用多个框架。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and Public Policy》 |2008年第2期|p.121-138|共18页
  • 作者

    Talukder Kana; Kuzma Jennifer;

  • 作者单位

    Kana Talukder was at the Science, Technology and EnvironmentPolicy Program (2004-2006), Humphrey Institute, University ofMinnesota, Minneapolis, USA;

    Email: taluk007@umn.edu.Jennifer Kuzma is Associate Professor, Center for Science, Technology,and Public Policy;

    University of Minnesota, 254 HumphreyCenter, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;

    Email:kuzma007@umn.edu;

    Tel:612-625-6337;

    Fax:612-625-3513.;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    a case study of genetically engineered cotton in India;

    机译:印度转基因棉花的案例研究;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:43:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号