首页> 外文期刊>Science as Culture >International Ties at Peripheral Sites: Co-producing Social Processes and Scientific Knowledge in Latin America
【24h】

International Ties at Peripheral Sites: Co-producing Social Processes and Scientific Knowledge in Latin America

机译:周边站点的国际联系:拉丁美洲共同产生的社会过程和科学知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent decades, scientific knowledge has been increasingly expected to contribute to the resolution of public and controversial issues in Latin America. However, in peripheral sites of knowledge and economic production, the dynamics of both science and society have been complicated by tensions between the demands of local stakeholders and the ties with the global centers of technical and scientific expertise. First, local public issues are often addressed in merely discursive ways, rather than effectively, in research and expert advice; second, local scientific elites often establish links with experts and the global centers of science in order to legitimate their stance against competing approaches. An analysis of four case studies (neglected diseases, mining pollution, wildlife conservation and migration studies) involving the production of scientific knowledge intended to address public issues in Latin America reveals, first, that material and symbolic asymmetries determine the outcomes of these engagements and, second, that international ties with peripheral sites affect the cognitive definition of the issues at stake and the range of public interventions devised to address them. Yet, in these four case studies, the key actors that mediate links between local stakeholders and international counterparts - or, 'drivers' - mobilize the bodies of knowledge that, ultimately, shape the cognitive and political contours of the social issues at stake.
机译:在最近的几十年中,人们越来越期望科学知识有助于解决拉丁美洲的公共和有争议的问题。但是,在知识和经济生产的外围场所,地方利益相关者的需求与与全球技术和科学专门知识中心之间的关系之间的紧张关系使科学和社会的动态变得复杂。首先,在研究和专家建议中,地方公共问题通常仅以话语方式解决,而不是有效解决。第二,当地的科学精英经常与专家和全球科学中心建立联系,以使自己的立场与竞争方法抗衡。对涉及旨在解决拉丁美洲公共问题的科学知识的四个案例研究(被忽视的疾病,采矿污染,野生动植物保护和迁徙研究)进行的分析表明,首先,物质和象征性的不对称性决定了这些活动的结果,并且,第二,与外围站点的国际联系会影响所涉问题的认知定义以及为解决这些问题而设计的公共干预措施的范围。然而,在这四个案例研究中,调解本地利益相关者与国际同行之间的联系的主要参与者(或“驱动者”)动员了知识体系,这些知识最终塑造了所涉社会问题的认知和政治轮廓。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science as Culture》 |2019年第4期|562-588|共27页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Univ Americas Puebla Int Relat & Polit Sci Cholula Mexico;

    Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn Buenos Aires DF Argentina|Ctr Ciencia Tecnol & Soc Hidalgo 775 RA-1405 Buenos Aires DF Argentina;

    Ctr Ciencia Tecnol & Soc Hidalgo 775 RA-1405 Buenos Aires DF Argentina|Univ Buenos Aires Buenos Aires DF Argentina;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Social issues; use of scientific knowledge; co-production of knowledge; centers and peripheries; drivers;

    机译:社会问题;利用科学知识;共同生产知识;中心和外围;司机;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 05:18:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号