...
首页> 外文期刊>The safety & health practitioner >More questions than answers
【24h】

More questions than answers

机译:问题多于答案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

At the end of 2008 the first health and safety case in years to come before the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) was heard. R v Chargot Ltd and others [2008] UKHL 73 was meant to deal with many of those grey areas in the law practitioners have been grappling with for some years. Unfortunately, it has transpired the case has raised more questions than it has answered.rnAnecdotal evidence suggests that in 2009 there were at least as many different interpretations of the meaning of Chargot as there were judges who heard cases and tried to apply it! It should therefore come as no surprise that the first case has already come before the Court of Appeal to try to make sense of what their Lordships intended. This is hardly a satisfactory state of affairs.
机译:2008年底,上议院(现为最高法院)审理了数年来的第一起健康与安全案。 R v Chargot Ltd等人[2008] UKHL 73的目的是解决多年来困扰律师的许多灰色领域。不幸的是,事实证明,此案提出的问题多于已回答的问题。rn轶事证据表明,在2009年,对夏格特(Chargot)含义的解释至少与审理该案并尝试适用该案的法官一样多!因此,毫不奇怪,第一个案件已经提交上诉法院,试图弄清他们的主权意图。这很难令人满意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号