...
【24h】

MAILS HOT

机译:邮件热

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I read Diane Fox's letter (Mailshot, September) with interest, and I felt drawn to make the following observations: 1. The UK's record on employee safety is one of the best and, clearly the health and safety system in the UK is working well. Why discard something that is working? 2. The HSE is not a bunch of self-appointed guardians of worker safety. Their remit, roles and responsibilities were, and are, defined by the HSWA. 3. It would appear from the journals that developing occupational health is an ad hoc process, with a number of organisations lobbying and promoting their own particular causes. Perhaps the HSE's role should be expanded to drive this development, rather than responding to the work of others.
机译:我饶有兴趣地阅读了黛安·福克斯(Diane Fox)的来信(邮件快照,9月),并感到有以下看法:1.英国在员工安全方面的记录是最好的记录之一,很明显,英国的健康与安全体系运作良好。为什么要丢弃起作用的东西? 2. HSE不是一群自命为工人安全的监护人。他们的职权,角色和责任由HSWA负责,并且由HSWA定义。 3.从期刊看来,发展职业卫生是一个特殊过程,许多组织在游说和推广自己的特殊原因。也许应该扩大HSE的角色以推动这一发展,而不是对他人的工作做出回应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号