首页> 外文期刊>Review of quantitative finance and accounting >The relation between R&D intensity and future market returns: does expensing versus capitalization matter?
【24h】

The relation between R&D intensity and future market returns: does expensing versus capitalization matter?

机译:研发强度与未来市场回报之间的关系:费用与资本化关系重大吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Australian accounting environment provides an ideal setting for examining the impact of different accounting treatments of firms' R&D activities on their subsequent returns. Unlike US firms, which can only expense R&D, Australian GAAP permits firms to either expense or capitalize their R&D expenditure. We examine separately the market impact of the R&D intensity of all R&D active firms, 'capitalizers' and 'expensers'. Our results suggest that firms with higher R&D intensity perform better, regardless of the accounting method used, consistent with the resource-based view of the firm. We also find some evidence that firms which expense R&D outperform those which capitalize R&D after controlling for R&D intensity.
机译:澳大利亚会计环境为检查企业研发活动的不同会计处理方法对其后续收益的影响提供了理想的环境。与只能为研发支出的美国公司不同,澳大利亚公认会计原则允许公司对研发支出进行支出或资本化。我们分别研究所有研发活跃公司,“资本家”和“支出者”的研发强度对市场的影响。我们的结果表明,无论采用哪种会计方法,具有较高研发强度的企业的绩效都更好,这与企业基于资源的观点一致。我们还发现一些证据表明,在控制了R&D强度之后,花费R&D的公司胜过那些将R&D资本化的公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号