首页> 外文期刊>Review of Political Economy >Sraffa's Interpretation of Marx's Treatment of Fixed Capital
【24h】

Sraffa's Interpretation of Marx's Treatment of Fixed Capital

机译:斯拉发对马克思对固定资本待遇的解释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is well known that Sraffa analyzed fixed capital as a 'joint product' along with regular products, such that in each period a given machine (together with other material and labor inputs) produces a regular product plus a one-period-older machine of the same type. What is perhaps less well known is that Sraffa attributed this same method of dealing with fixed capital to Marx, and to Torrens, Malthus, and Ricardo. This paper examines the textual evidence presented by Sraffa to support his interpretation of Marx's treatment of fixed capital, and also examines more comprehensive textual evidence from the three volumes of Capital not considered by Sraffa. It is argued that Marx did not treat fixed capital as a joint product in his theory of prices, but instead consistently assumed a 'straight-line' method of depreciation, according to which a constant fraction of the total value of the fixed capital is transferred to the price of the product in each period, and the remaining value of the fixed capital is not part of the value of the product, but instead 'remains fixed' in the capital goods.
机译:众所周知,Sraffa将固定资本与常规产品一起作为“联合产品”进行了分析,这样,在每个时期内,一台给定的机器(连同其他材料和劳动力投入)就可以生产出一个常规产品以及一个旧时期的机器相同的类型。也许鲜为人知的是,斯拉法(Sraffa)将这种处理固定资本的方法归因于马克思,托伦斯,马尔萨斯和里卡多。本文考察了斯拉发提出的文本证据,以支持他对马克思对固定资本的处理的解释,并且还从斯拉发未考虑的三本《资本论》中考察了更全面的文本证据。有人认为,马克思在其价格理论中并未将固定资本视为联合产品,而是一贯假定采用“直线”折旧方法,根据该方法,固定资本总值的固定部分被转移固定资产的剩余价值不属于产品价值的一部分,而是固定资产中的“保持固定”状态。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Review of Political Economy》 |2009年第1期|85-100|共16页
  • 作者

    Fred Moseley;

  • 作者单位

    Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号