首页> 外文期刊>The review of financial studies >Does Anonymity Matter in Electronic Limit Order Markets?
【24h】

Does Anonymity Matter in Electronic Limit Order Markets?

机译:电子限价订单市场上的匿名性很重要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We develop a model in which limit order traders possess volatility information. We show that in this case the size of the bid-ask spread is informative about future volatility. Moreover, if volatility information is in part private, we establish that (i) the size of the bid-ask spread and (ii) its informativeness about future volatility should change in the same direction when limit order traders' identifiers stop being disclosed. We test these predictions using data from the Paris Bourse. As expected, we find that the average quoted spread and its informativeness are significantly smaller when limit order traders' identifiers are concealed. These findings suggest that the limit order book is a channel for volatility information.
机译:我们开发了一个模型,其中限价订单交易者拥有波动性信息。我们表明,在这种情况下,买卖差价的大小可以为将来的波动提供信息。此外,如果波动率信息部分是私人的,我们确定(i)买卖价差的大小和(ii)当限价订单交易商的标识符停止披露时,其有关未来波动率的信息性应朝同一方向改变。我们使用巴黎证券交易所的数据测试这些预测。不出所料,我们发现隐藏限价订单交易者的标识符后,平均报价价差及其信息性大大降低。这些发现表明,限价单是波动性信息的渠道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号