首页> 外文期刊>The review of financial studies >Too Many to Fail? Evidence of Regulatory Forbearance When the Banking Sector Is Weak
【24h】

Too Many to Fail? Evidence of Regulatory Forbearance When the Banking Sector Is Weak

机译:太多失败了?银行业疲软时的监管宽容证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article studies bank failures in twenty-one emerging market countries in the 1990s. By using a competing risk hazard model for bank survival, we show that a government is less likely to take over or close a failing bank if the banking system is weak. This Too-Many-to-Fail effect is robust to controlling for macroeconomic factors, financial crises, the Too-Big-to-Fail effect, domestic financial development, and concerns due to systemic risk and information spillovers. The article also shows that the Too-Many-to-Fail effect is stronger for larger banks and when there is a large government budget deficit. (JEL E58, F30,G21,G28)
机译:本文研究了1990年代二十一个新兴市场国家的银行倒闭情况。通过使用竞争性风险隐患模型进行银行生存,我们表明,如果银行体系薄弱,政府接管或关闭破产银行的可能性就较小。这种“太过失败”效应对于控制宏观经济因素,金融危机,“过大而失败”效应,国内金融发展以及由于系统性风险和信息溢出所引起的担忧具有强大的控制力。该文章还显示,对于大型银行和政府预算赤字较大的情况,“太多到失败”效应更强。 (JEL E58,F30,G21,G28)

著录项

  • 来源
    《The review of financial studies》 |2011年第4期|p.1378-1405|共28页
  • 作者

    Craig O. Brown; I. Serdar Dine;

  • 作者单位

    Bert W. Wasserman Department of Economics and Finance, Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College, City University of New York, One Bernard Baruch Way, PO Box B10-225, NewYork, NY 10010;

    Department of Finance, MIT-Sloan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号