首页> 外文期刊>Rethinking Marxism >China and India: Postcolonial Informal Empires in the Emerging Global Order
【24h】

China and India: Postcolonial Informal Empires in the Emerging Global Order

机译:中国和印度:新兴的全球秩序中的后殖民非正式帝国

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The recent debates within and beyond Marxism around empire and imperialism focus on deterritorialization, but fail to see non-Western states as anything other than collaborators or victims. Highlighting the importance of center-periphery relations within the territorially bounded political space of the nation-state, this paper puts forward a new concept of the Postcolonial Informal Empire (PIE) to characterize the emerging powers of China and India. The greatest paradox of PIEs is that a postcolonial impulse—to critically appropriate Western ideas and technologies such as sovereignty, nationalism, and the free market to build the multinational state and combine it with an affirmation of stories of historical greatness and long existing, pre-Westernized, civilizational-national cultures—enables the political entities to consolidate and discipline their borderlands and reduce diverse inhabiting peoples to culturally different but politically subservient subjects. It is predominantly a nationalist politics, and not economic calculability or financial interests, that shapes PIEs’ center-borderlands relations.View full textDownload full textKeywordsImperialism, China, Tibet, India, Kashmir, Nationalism, PostcolonialRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2012.635039
机译:马克思主义内部和外部最近围绕帝国主义和帝国主义的辩论都集中在地域化问题上,但没有将非西方国家视为合作者或受害者之外的任何事物。本文强调了民族国家在领土有限的政治空间内的中心-外围关系的重要性,提出了后殖民非正式帝国(PIE)的新概念,以表征中国和印度的新兴大国。 PIE的最大悖论是,后殖民冲动-严格地运用诸如主权,民族主义和自由市场之类的西方思想和技术来建立多民族国家,并将其与对历史悠久和长期存在的故事的肯定相结合。 -西方文明的民族文化使政治实体能够巩固和规范其边境地区,并减少居住在不同文化中但政治上从属的人。塑造PIE的中心边境关系的主要是民族主义政治,而不是经济可计算性或金融利益。查看全文下载全文关键字帝国主义,中国,西藏,印度,克什米尔,民族主义,后殖民主义相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor &Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2012.635039

著录项

  • 来源
    《Rethinking Marxism》 |2012年第1期|p.68-86|共19页
  • 作者

    Dibyesh Anand;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:08:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号