首页> 外文期刊>Restoration ecology >The use of spatially patterned methods for vegetation restoration and management across systems
【24h】

The use of spatially patterned methods for vegetation restoration and management across systems

机译:在系统中使用空间图案化方法进行植被恢复和管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Widespread degradation of natural lands has created an urgent need for restoration. However, the high cost of conventional techniques limits the extent and success of restoration efforts. As a result, practitioners have developed new cost-effective techniques. Spatially patterned restoration methods, where established clusters of plant species serve as propagule sources across a broad target area, have been proposed as practical restoration techniques. The spatial patterning is expected to reduce initial costs and provide ecological benefits such as increasing habitat heterogeneity. Over the past three decades, multiple spatially patterned restoration methods have emerged around the globe; however, it is unclear whether applications and theoretical foundations have been connected across methods. We conducted a literature review and bibliometric network analyses to (1) examine patterns in focal study systems, cost-effectiveness, and ecological outcomes for spatially patterned restoration methods and (2) analyze connectivity among the bodies of literature associated with common spatially patterned restoration methods to identify knowledge gaps and synergies. We found the three most commonly studied methods are applied nucleation, slot seeding, and strip seeding. Applied nucleation studies mainly occurred in tropical forests and emphasized plant diversity and seed-dispersing animal visitation. Slot-seeding and strip-seeding studies both primarily occurred in temperate grasslands and emphasized plant establishment and production. Applied nucleation and slot-seeding approaches had distinct theoretical bases, as evidenced by patterns in reference citation, while strip-seeding approaches did not draw from a unified body of literature. We discuss the need for full economic analyses and theoretical links between the different methods.
机译:广泛的自然土地退化已经迫切需要恢复。然而,传统技术的高成本限制了恢复努力的程度和成功。因此,从业者开发了新的经济高效的技术。已经提出了已经提出了已建立的植物物种簇作为宽靶区域的繁殖源的空间图案化的恢复方法,作为实际恢复技术。期望空间图案化减少初始成本,并提供生态益处,如增加栖息地异质性。在过去的三十年中,全球遍布了多种空间图案化的恢复方法;但是,目前尚不清楚应用程序和理论基础是否已在跨方法连接。我们进行了文献综述和派对测量网络分析到(1)检查局灶性研究系统中的模式,成本效益和用于空间图案化恢复方法的生态结果和(2)与常见空间图案化恢复方法相关的文献体中的连接性分析识别知识差距和协同作用。我们发现三种最常见的方法是应用成核,槽播种和脱色的方法。应用成核研究主要发生在热带森林中,并强调植物多样性和种子分散动物探视。槽播种和条带播种研究主要是在温带草地和强调的植物建立和生产中发生。应用成核和槽播种方法具有不同的理论基础,如参考文献中的图案所证明,而条带播种方法没有从统一的文献体系中吸取。我们讨论了不同方法之间完全经济分析和理论联系的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号