首页> 外文期刊>Restoration ecology >Restored native prairie supports abundant and species-rich native bee communities on conventional farms
【24h】

Restored native prairie supports abundant and species-rich native bee communities on conventional farms

机译:恢复的本地草原为常规农场提供了丰富且物种丰富的本地蜜蜂社区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Native pollinators are increasingly needed on conventional farms yet rarely fostered via management. One solution is habitat restoration in marginal areas, but colonization may be constrained if resident pollinator richness is low or if restored areas fail to provide sufficient floral or nesting resources. We quantified restoration outcomes for native bees, and associated resources, on three conventional farms with forb-grass prairie plantings on marginal areas of varying sizes, in a heavily farmed region of central North America. We tested bee abundance and richness in restored prairie versus the dominant habitats of the region-crops, forest remnants, and edges of fields and roads. Restored prairie supported 2x more species (95 of 119 total species) and 3x more bees (72% of captured individuals) compared to the other cover types. All richness and abundance differences among habitat types were associated with higher floral resources in restored prairie. Thirty percent of the bee species were unique to prairie, consistent with long-distance dispersal but begging the question of origin given the absence of prairie regionally. Our results suggest that road and field edges may be the source, as these areas had more floral and nesting resources than forest or crop fields combined and supported 55% of all species despite covering only approximately 5% of the sampled farms. Habitat scarcity is not the only constraint on native bees in agricultural landscapes, with increasing concern over disease and chemicals. However, we observed that restored areas on marginal lands of conventional farms can support abundant and species-rich populations of native bees.
机译:传统农场越来越需要本地授粉媒介,但很少通过管理来培育。一种解决方法是在边缘地区恢复栖息地,但是如果居民的传粉媒介丰富度较低或恢复的地区无法提供足够的花卉或巢状资源,则定居可能会受到限制。我们在北美中部一个人口稠密的地区,在三个大小不等的边缘地区种植了草茅草的传统农场中,量化了本地蜜蜂及其相关资源的恢复结果。我们测试了恢复的草原与该地区农作物,森林残留物以及田野和道路边缘的主要栖息地之间的蜜蜂丰度和丰富度。与其他覆盖类型相比,恢复的草原支持的物种增加了2倍(在119个物种中有95个),而蜜蜂则增加了3倍(占捕获个体的72%)。在恢复的草原上,生境类型之间所有的丰富度和丰度差异都与较高的花卉资源有关。 30%的蜜蜂是草原特有的,与远距离散布是一致的,但由于区域内没有草原,因此乞求起源问题。我们的结果表明,道路和田间的边缘可能是来源,因为这些地区的花卉和筑巢资源比森林或农作物地的总和还多,尽管仅覆盖了大约5%的采样农场,却支持了所有物种的55%。生境稀缺并不是农业景观中对本地蜜蜂的唯一限制,人们对疾病和化学物质的关注日益增加。但是,我们观察到常规农场边缘土地上的恢复区域可以支撑本地蜜蜂的丰富种群和物种丰富的种群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号