...
【24h】

Former Times

机译:前时代

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The September 1994 issue of Resource Recycling featured the results of an extensive survey that assessed the costs of recycling around the nation. The primary takeaway: The average cost per ton for recycling was roughly three times more than the average cost per ton for refuse. But the firm undertaking the research, Ecodata, Inc., also concluded that as diversion rates increase, recycling costs drop dramatically, a powerful statistic for recycling coordinators aiming to convince decision-makers of the long-term economic benefits tied to successful materials diversion. The study looked at trash and recycling collection in 60 randomly selected municipalities and split the locales into two categories: cities that handled their own recycling collection and those that relied on contract recycling collection. For cities that used a municipal system for recycling collection, the average cost per ton of recycling came in at $199.63 while the average cost per ton on the refuse side was $58.04. For this category, then, recycling collection was on average 3.4 times more expensive than trash collection.
机译:1994年9月出版的《资源回收》杂志刊登了一项广泛调查的结果,该调查评估了全国范围内的回收成本。主要收获:回收的每吨平均成本约为垃圾的每吨平均成本的三倍。但是进行这项研究的公司Ecodata,Inc.也得出结论,随着转移率的提高,回收成本急剧下降,这是回收协调员的有力统计数据,旨在使决策者相信与成功的材料转移相关的长期经济利益。该研究调查了60个随机选择的城市中的垃圾和回收利用,并将地点划分为两类:处理自己的回收利用的城市和依赖合同回收利用的城市。对于使用市政系统进行回收收集的城市,每吨回收的平均成本为199.63美元,而垃圾方面的每吨平均成本为58.04美元。那么,对于此类垃圾,回收垃圾的平均费用是垃圾垃圾的3.4倍。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Resource recycling》 |2014年第9期|43-43|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号