首页> 外文期刊>Research in Science Education >What Do Students “Construct” According to Constructivism in Science Education?
【24h】

What Do Students “Construct” According to Constructivism in Science Education?

机译:在科学教育中,学生根据建构主义“建构”了什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper aims at shedding light on what students can “construct” when they learn science and how this construction process may be supported. Constructivism is a pluralist theory of science education. As a consequence, I support, there are several points of view concerning this construction process. Firstly, I stress that constructivism is rooted in two fields, psychology of cognitive development and epistemology, which leads to two ways of describing the construction process: either as a process of enrichment and/or reorganization of the cognitive structures at the mental level, or as a process of building or development of models or theories at the symbolic level. Secondly, I argue that the usual distinction between “personal constructivism” (PC) and “social constructivism” (SC) originates in a difference of model of reference: the one of PC is Piaget’s description of “spontaneous” concepts, assumed to be constructed by students on their own when interacting with their material environment, the one of SC is Vygotsky’s description of scientific concepts, assumed to be introduced by the teacher by means of verbal communication. Thirdly, I support the idea that, within SC, there are in fact two trends: one, in line with Piaget’s work, demonstrates how cooperation among students affects the development of each individual’s cognitive structures; the other, in line with Vygotsky’s work, claims that students can understand and master new models only if they are introduced to the scientific culture by their teacher. Fourthly, I draw attention to the process of “problem construction” identified by some French authors. Finally, I advocate for an integrated approach in science education, taking into account all the facets of science learning and teaching mentioned above and emphasizing their differences as well as their interrelations. Some suggestions intended to improve the efficiency of science teaching are made.
机译:本文旨在阐明学生在学习科学时可以“构建”的内容以及如何支持该构建过程。建构主义是科学教育的多元化理论。因此,我支持,关于此构建过程有几种观点。首先,我强调建构主义植根于两个领域,即认知发展心理学和认识论心理学,这导致了两种描述建构过程的方式:要么是在心理层面上丰富和/或重组认知结构的过程,要么是作为在符号级别构建或发展模型或理论的过程。其次,我认为“个人建构主义”(PC)和“社会建构主义”(SC)之间通常的区别源于参照模型的不同:PC之一是伯爵对“自发”概念的描述,假定该概念是被建构的。由学生自己与物质环境互动时,SC之一是维果茨基对科学概念的描述,假定是教师通过口头交流引入的。第三,我支持这样一种观点,即在SC内实际上存在两种趋势:一是与伯爵(Piaget)的作品相吻合,表明了学生之间的合作如何影响每个人的认知结构的发展;二是学生之间的合作。另一种是与维果斯基的著作相一致的,声称学生只有在老师介绍了科学文化后,才能理解和掌握新模型。第四,我提请注意一些法国作者指出的“问题建构”过程。最后,我主张在科学教育中采取综合方法,同时考虑到上述科学学习和教学的所有方面,并强调它们之间的差异及其相互关系。提出了一些旨在提高科学教学效率的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号