首页> 外文期刊>Research in Science Education >Consistency of Practical and Formal Epistemologies of Science Held by Participants of a Research Apprenticeship
【24h】

Consistency of Practical and Formal Epistemologies of Science Held by Participants of a Research Apprenticeship

机译:研究学徒参加者对科学的实践认识论和形式论认识论的一致性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this research was to examine the consistency between students’ practical and formal understandings of scientific epistemologies (also known as nature of science (NOS) understandings) in the context of a research apprenticeship program. Six high school student participants of a residential summer research apprenticeship program at a major university in the southeastern USA were interviewed twice during their experience to elicit their perspectives regarding their practical epistemologies. A phenomenological approach was used to analyze these interviews. The students held practical epistemological understandings of scientific knowledge that were described as being developmental, valuable, formulaic, and authoritative. A survey administered at the end of the program was used to reveal students’ formal epistemologies of science. These practical and formal epistemologies were described in terms of Sandoval’s (Science Education 89:634–656, 2005) epistemological themes and then compared for all participants. Findings revealed that, for most students, at least some level of consistency was present between their formal and practical epistemological understandings of each theme. In fact, for only one student with one theme, no consistency was evident. These results hold implications for the teaching, learning, and assessment of NOS understandings in these contexts as well as for the design of apprenticeship learning experiences in science.
机译:这项研究的目的是在研究学徒计划的背景下,检验学生对科学认识论的实践和正式理解之间的一致性(也称为科学本质(NOS)理解)。在美国东南部的一所主要大学中,有六个高中学生参加了夏季住宅研究学徒计划,他们在经历中接受了两次访谈,以得出他们对实际认识论的看法。现象学方法用于分析这些访谈。学生掌握了对科学知识的实践认识论理解,被认为具有发展性,价值,公式化和权威性。在计划结束时进行的一项调查被用来揭示学生的正式科学认识论。根据Sandoval(Science Education 89:634–656,2005)认识论主题描述了这些实用和形式化的认识论,然后将其与所有参与者进行了比较。研究结果表明,对于大多数学生而言,他们对每个主题的形式上和实际的认识论理解之间至少存在一定程度的一致性。实际上,对于只有一个主题一个的学生,没有任何明显的一致性。这些结果对于在这些情况下对NOS理解的教学,学习和评估以及科学学徒学习体验的设计具有启示意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号