首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >How do policy instruments generate new ones? Analysing policy instruments feedback and interaction in educational research in England, 1986-2014
【24h】

How do policy instruments generate new ones? Analysing policy instruments feedback and interaction in educational research in England, 1986-2014

机译:政策仪器如何生成新的? 在1986 - 2014年,分析政策仪器在教育研究中的反馈和互动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The study of research funding arrangements and the production of scientific knowledge has been marked by a lack of understanding about how research funding instruments interact and how these instruments shape policy-making and research fields. To fill this research gap, this study is theoretically supported by policy feedback and policy instruments' interaction studies. It investigates the effects of the UK's research assessment exercise in the creation of the most emblematic national thematic research program for the field of educational research in the country - the Teaching and Learning Research Programme (TLRP). Based on qualitative analysis of policy documents and semi-structured interviews with policy-makers and boundary-spanners, this paper shows how the research assessment exercise contributed to the creation of the TLRP and how the interaction between the two policy instruments shaped the field of educational research in England. In particular, the results show a) how the institutionalisation of the research assessment led to frame a "quality problem" in educational research that legitimated several policy initiatives, including the creation of the national thematic research programme (interpretative effects) and a shift in resources allocation (resource/incentive effects); and b) how the interaction between the two policy instruments contributed to methodological and epistemic drifts in the field of educational research.
机译:研究资金安排和科学知识的生产缺乏了解研究资金工具如何互动以及这些仪器形式的政策制定和研究领域的研究。为了填补这项研究差距,本研究通过政策反馈和政策工具的互动研究理论上得到了理论支持。它调查了英国研究评估练习对全国教育研究领域最具标志性国家专题研究计划的影响 - 教学和学习研究计划(TLRP)。本文根据对政策文件和半结构性访谈的定性分析,本文展示了研究评估运动如何为创建TLRP以及两项政策工具之间的互动方式为教育领域的贡献。英格兰研究。特别是,结果表明,研究评估的制度化如何框架教育研究中的“质量问题”,这些研究具有合法的若干政策举措,包括建立国家专题研究计划(解释性效应)和资源转变分配(资源/激励效应); b)两项政策文书之间的互动如何导致教育研究领域的方法和认知漂移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号