首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Policy learning in Swiss research policy―the case of the National Centres of Competence in Research
【24h】

Policy learning in Swiss research policy―the case of the National Centres of Competence in Research

机译:瑞士研究政策中的政策学习-以国家研究能力中心为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The article treats the problem of "rationality" in learning processes in research policies. The underlying hypothesis is that there are contemporary efforts in research policy-making, which, against views in organisational sociology like "bounded rationality" or "garbage-can", endeavour to "rationalise" the process of decision-making in research policies. This hypothesis is worked out by taking one example, the setting-up of the "National Centres of Competence in Research" (NCCR) in Switzerland and analyse the processes that have contributed to the acceptance of this funding measure. Our finding is that Switzerland has introduced some "rationalising devices" but that these devices are still insufficiently institutionalised and can be further elaborated. In addition, it is made clear that goal-oriented problem-solving and interests are closely intertwined and cannot be dissociated from another. This may have distorting effects on the rationality of the learning process. It is, nevertheless, a necessary condition in order to learn at all.
机译:本文讨论了研究政策中学习过程中的“合理性”问题。基本假设是,当代在研究政策制定方面做出了努力,这些努力与组织社会学中诸如“有限理性”或“垃圾桶”之类的观点相反,致力于“合理化”研究政策决策过程。通过以瑞士“国家研究能力中心”(NCCR)的建立为例,阐明了这一假设,并分析了有助于接受这项资助措施的过程。我们的发现是,瑞士引入了一些“合理化手段”,但这些手段制度化程度仍然不足,可以进一步完善。另外,很明显,面向目标的解决问题和利益是紧密联系在一起的,不能相互分离。这可能会影响学习过程的合理性。但是,这是学习的必要条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号